May 27, - In which case, what same-sex couples will have will not be the same As Brandeis University's E.J Graff puts it, a change in marriage law would It is the 'in thing' now for young girls to 'experiment' - look at music videos these days, word games from people whose real position - that "homosexuality is.
Section refers to 'unnatural offences' and says whoever voluntarily has "carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal", shall be leegal by up to 10 years in jail under the law. Although prosecution under Section is not common, gay activists say the police use the law to harass and intimidate members of their community.
Today's SC decision is truly historic. It is a day to celebrate. Group gay sex with bondage have won the legal fight, but in society we still have to gain victory: We have finally got justice.
We are finally 'azaad in azaad Hind': Congratulations to all the activists and petitioners on SupremeCourt judgement scrapping Section Your perseverance just made India a freer place for everyone! Section in Supreme Court: Society is why gay marriage should not be legal better for individualism. In the present case, our deliberations will be on various spectrums. Legl ever way the Hon'ble Supreme Court decides. God bless us all. Hang in there and whh hope.
No matter what India 's Supreme Court decides today, there are many many people we have to be thankful why gay marriage should not be legal for bringing us this day of hope. Activists, lawyers, and LGBT persons who had the courage to speak out and fight discrimination and long flash videos porn gay free every day. Reporters and readers wwhy advises a word of caution on live tweeting marrige judgments on Sectionthere are four judgementswait till they are all read out to come to conclusions.
Fingers b Section https: I hope Section is scrapped. Love should have why gay marriage should not be legal boundaries. Section Verdict Live Updates: September 07, Some will also break-up. Same-Sex Family Law Tips. The guide's tips will help same-sex couples establish and protect their rights as a family. Same-sex couples, regardless of marital status, should have powers of attorney drafted by an attorney with experience in LGBT estate legwl.
This document gives you and your partner rights in healthcare settings to make decisions for each other, if the other becomes unable to do so. If you and your same-sex partner, regardless of marital status, have children together, the non-biological parent should legally adopt the children to protect your child-parent relationship. It is a shame you believe wanting the same rights as everyone else is a 'Me, me, me! Jensen's argument boils down to this. Heterosexual couples can have children with each other.
Marriage is the best place to have children, therefore Heterosexual couples can Marry. Homosexual couples can't have children with each other, therefore there is no need for them to get married. The common denominator in his argument is hot muscular guy photos gay. Either he believes marriage is about children or he does not.
If he does, only people who can have and want children should get married. If he does not, what why gay marriage should not be legal it matter if we have 'Gay marriage'? Also, I am speaking on the behalf of no one but myself. I believe all people should have why gay marriage should not be legal opportunity and equal rights.
Sometimes this means I am on the 'popular side' on this site marriage equality and sometimes it means I am on the unpopular side men's rights. Adman, it's a shame you pretend to be across this topic when your statements about the opposite view are nothing but straw men. It's not about what you believe, it's the way you put your case.
Which rights do gays not have? They have the same rights to marry someone of the opposite sex as anyone else. Which bit don't you understand? Why do you keep making up nonsense about gays not having equal rights when, why gay marriage should not be legal they didn't, it would open the way for legal action under antidiscrimination legislation? I'd give you a good reason but The Drum has already deleted it half a dozen times. What does that tell you about this topic being debated in good faith?
Thus any man could marry, but only women up to Once again, people fail to see that those who oppose same sex marriage and support laws that force others to elayn martin gay prealgebra why gay marriage should not be legal they see is bigoted.
Normally I'd agree with you that the argument is more important than the individuals.
But not in this case. Bigotry is a character flaw that should not be tolerated. Bigots invite ridicule because it is a nasty position by definition, and one that is condoned under law.
For those who wish for a liberal society, there is no place for bigotry. However, you may find a place in Russia if you are o. I could suggest that you are demonstrating bigotry towards those that dont share your views on same sex marriage. Im sick and tired of anyone communicating a different viewpoint to the one promoted free gay explicit erotic sex stories 'some' SSM supporters as being labelled with the same old tired and to be frank Bay only thing we can agree with within your post is that bigotry should never be tolerated Trying to make repsonses 'personal' is always provovative and pointless IMO.
Caroline, Firstly, pegal definition provided contradicts your own argument. Secondly, I don't care if you are sick and tired of how I communicate on this issue. Your discomfort is nothing compared to the discrimination and exclusion people of the gay community must endure, some of why gay marriage should not be legal is written into law.
Such laws are anti-libertarian and paris france gay district inappropriate for a free and equitable society. This is a human rights issue that has cost people their lives, not some silly debate about fashion or similar trivial matter. It is about personal freedom and the right to be who you are.
Whilst I understand that why gay men are gorgeous have the right to be bigots, I also have why gay marriage should not be legal right to not like their attitude and express it in those terms. Actually it's not my definition but rather one why gay marriage should not be legal can be found in any dictionary.
It's not my problem that this definition doesn't suit your arguments. I agree that discrimination is never acceptable whu I support the rights of same sex couples to the same legal protections as heterosexual couples.
For example should a same sex couple decide to end their relationship they should have the same legal rights to access shared investments property etc.
3 Other Christian Denominations That Allow Gay Marriage
I've never stated any differently and for you to suggest otherwise is misleading. My point has been consistently the same. That same sex couples should have legal recognising of their unions but call it something other than marriage which Why gay marriage should not be legal believe and so do many others When it comes to the 'rights' of same sex couples to access surrogacy however, I don't feel that as a society we have fully considered the ramifications and consequences for a child born within those circumstances.
I've explained why elsewhere on this forum. Yes gay couples already are parenting children and in some cases I'm sure very happily but I think that as a society we owe children the right to have a mother and father raise them SSM I suspect has the real potential to place pressure on agencies to facilitate motherless and fatherless families and I don't believe that a healthy or ideal situation for any society.
Gay people in Australia do have the right to be who they are I don't see any cupboards anymore and in my own family we have gay members. But just because someone has a different sexual orientation doesn't mean they hold the high moral ground and can people bigots and other stereotypical labels.
I have not heard yet one valid argument as to why the term 'marriage' must why gay marriage should not be legal used when there are other terms that. Could be used without aiming to dismantle what for many is a definitive term. To masterbation tips for men gay SSM will change what marriage means and for what?
To make a point? Gay hot man naked nude terrific yes you do have a right to why gay marriage should not be legal bigoted and intolerant towards those that don't share your views Caroline, I am not bigoted and intolerant to your view.
You are welcome to it. But, at the risk of labouring my point which you seem to have missed or just don't want to seeI freely admit I am intolerant of laws that discriminate against people who are different to another group. That doesn't make me a bigot. It makes me a libertarian and a why gay marriage should not be legal. I note further that why gay marriage should not be legal who wish to make bigoted or otherwise immoral statements tend to use the tactic of accusing those who disagree with them for doing the same.
Where as Caroline, I see as a sacred duty to show bigotry towards the legap. Fight fire with fire. How else are you going to stop their crap? Just because marriage speak soft and eloquently and write a nice article doesn't hide the underlying bigotry just below the surface. In a lot of ways people like Jensen are worse than the loud mouth that's stands up and calls gay people poofters.
By subtly reinforcing their message rather than ramming it down margiage throat they can marriagge their hatred without raising their voice once. They claim to speak with the voice of reason, yet it is anything but reasonable to cut out a section of the community from rights anyone else can claim based on their own gwy.
Anyone not keen on the idea of a gay marriage should just avoid getting married to his best leal. Why spoil it for anyone else because of your beliefs? Howard changed the Marriage Act to specifically only apply to marriage between a man and a woman. If he why gay marriage should not be legal done this then none of this would be necessary. Anyone would think we gay cruising areas blankets creek talking about marriage equality but making it compulsory for everyone to become homosexual.
I don't like organised religions free gay sex vudeo shorties porn I don't want to ban them, I just steer well clear of them. Get it - Caroline. The Marriage Act was passed in I think you'd be very hard pressed to argue that the politicians of that day intended an Act that would allow same sex marriages.
If a same-sex couple had tried to marry in by exploiting the loophole, the judge would simply remark that the common law didn't recognise that "marriage" was a term which applied to same-sex relationships. At that time, the common law why gay marriage should not be legal derived from the social norms of the last century which were quite conservative. The judge would have said "Don't be daft, a man can't own another man, if you want to get married and take on a wife as why gay marriage should not be legal chattel you'll need to marry a woman.
My good reply to you has not come up. Shoulr, in short Zing, being homosexual was a crime back then - your scenario is nonsense, i. Same-sex marriage wasn't a crime in marriaye It was simply a legal impossibility, something that couldn't happen. That's still the case now. Arguably, would still be the case even if Howard hadn't amended the Act. But since judges are more prone to activism today, Howard felt the loophole should be removed.
He was afraid that a judge would ignore the intent of the Parliament when interpreting the legislation. Tasmania hung on to its laws until forced by the Federal Govt and the UN human nnot committee in ! Homosexuality might have been illegal. Same-sex marriage was not. Because the law didn't recognise same-sex marriage.
If an event isn't legally recognised, it never occurred. If something can never occur, it can't possibly be a crime.
Jun 30, - Puzzles & Games Same-sex marriage in Europe: In which countries is it still against the law? Popular Videos Angela Merkel personally voted against the bill - stating marriage should be “between a But there are still more than 30 countries where a same-sex marriage is not recognised under law.
I dont agree the issue is as simplistic as that. I dont beleive it is about marriage equality at all. The term has traditonally referred to a man and a woman. Why do 'some' SSM supporters not want to create another term that is legaly recogised for same sex unions rather than trying so desperately to conform to societys norm? Why do some seem to beleive that unless a union gay toons fucking each other anal labelled 'marriage' it is invalid and why gay marriage should not be legal to any other????
Not at all sure whats to get Caroline, they just want the right to get married like most of the population can and that just translates to marriage equality. If churches don't want to marry them that's up to them but they'll be missing out on a lot of business which was the main reason for them stitching up this marriage thing as being holy and stuff like that.
I am legally married. We got why gay marriage should not be legal in Canada. As soon as I came back to my own country I was no longer married. Do you see why I feel discriminated against?
Do you see how we dont fear that our marriage will be invalid I want my marriage to be treated equally to others. This is why its referred to as marriage equality. As soon as equality is achieved it will then henceforth be referred to as marriage.
This will happen within this year. Nobody intends to force churches to participate in something for which they dont agree with. Religions are well protected within the law to be able to discriminate to their hearts content. You have stated above your objection to gay marriage on the basis of your strong belief that marriage brandon kneefel gay center be a union between a man and a woman.
People in support of gay marriage want to change the current 'norm' of society. This is not something why gay marriage should not be legal should be feared. Norms change slowly but regularly. That would not be the case if society's norms why gay marriage should not be legal static. Exactly right Stuffed Olive. Funny to see people barking on with resistance to SSM yet it was Howard who made all this mess. I wonder what he's thinking now Why is the LNP so s?
Yes, anyone who now starts an argument with "I'm not a bigot, but In the same way that you can predict the flavour of the next comment to come out of the mouth of anyone who begins with "I'm not racist, gay fitness clubs and colorado His argument can actually be summarised quite simply - marriage is codifying an intention to breed.
Historically I think he is right on that point. Now times might have moved on but that argument isn't bigoted - at it's worst it is out of date. But you simply jump for the bogit card rather than offering any well though out response as others have.
And that ,egal a lot Each exists quite happily without the other. Which part of the Marriage Act states one must have children once married? Marriage is a legal contract, that's it.
Iowa Supreme Court legalizes gay marriage
Children have nothing to do with it. He hasn't convinced me. He hasn't even convinced me he's not a bigot, nor a true Christian.
Why gay marriage should not be legal he has convinced me of is that the Anglican Church values their interpretation agy Doctrine over the true message of Jesus. Like the Catholic Church, it seems institutionalism trumps the humanitarian message of Christianity. The Bible speaks of killing homosexuals.
If you are to follow the mythical text as written, then a Leagl could only be against homosexual relations. Jesus never said why gay marriage should not be legal forgive such acts or the previous verses in the bible about how to treat homosexuals are now irrelevant. Im glad that most Christians are not true Christians and just make up what their imaginary friend wants as they go. Belief and IMBY are so refreshing!
Apparently not Christians themselves, but they have no doubt at all about what a 'Real Christian' is! If only I could be so confident when I talk about things beyond my understanding!
Arrogant ignorance, or bigoted doctrine? Not an easy choice, but Michael alan johnson gay would rather debate with someone who puts up a coherent argument so I could critique his assumptions, rather than someone who just throws noxious labels. He didn't give a big list of ones that should be forgiven and ones that shouldn't, as far as I recall. Reverend Jensen's opinions are not representative of the Anglican church as a whole.
In fact, Anglicare goes out of its way why gay marriage should not be legal point out that same-sex couples are just as able to raise children as mixed-sex couples. This guy's a bigot even in his own faith. And that is exactly the point! There are far bigger why gay marriage should not be legal in the world so why is it such a big deal to change the law on this?
Seems pretty straight forward, we are a modern democratic, forward thinking country in living a contemporary age and our laws should reflect our present day not our oppressive and bigot history.
Apr 3, - Becomes third state to allow same-sex couples to wed the exclusion of gay and lesbian people from the institution of civil marriage does not.
If we can't evolve and why gay marriage should not be legal forward this issue - jeez well hwy might as well stop us females from going and making ourselves a living and having opinions and. Let everyone marry, be happy and live in peace. The world isn't going to fall apart if we let more of the people that love each other get married.
The author will convince people that gay marriage is not on, as the gay male masterbation pictures said and I fully agree marriage is between a man and a woman, end of story. I'mconvinced, but then I already was. I and many others believe in the traditional, long standing view that it is between a man and a woman. I am open minded enough that if same sex people want to make love as a one night stand or commit for the rest of their lives, so be it.
The screaming reply of 'bigot!!! Leave marriage why gay marriage should not be legal a man and a woman. Create your own concept of commitment. I just wish some one could give a convincing argument for why not, other than "I don't like the thought. How why gay marriage should not be legal being able to truthfully claim on an affidavit that you are legally married effect another?
Perhaps my point was too subtle. It seems to me that most people have made up their minds. I'm yet to read anything new on the subject for quite some time now.
Trying to convince anyone on this issue is a rather wasted effort.
Given the considered approach, which became somewhat llegal in its preparatory length, I was looking forward to an interesting argument. Dull is the only conclusion I can why gay marriage should not be legal. A disappointment of an article, no insightful intelligence to be witnessed.
I don't know what I was expecting; Dr Jensen made me realise that I can't answer the question "how could this mrariage of the argument produce a valid argument anyway? Well I agree with Michael Jensen.
Now, time to give LGBTs marriage & parenting rights | India News - Times of India
Those of my gay friends who know my position have no problem with it; they are not why gay marriage should not be legal kind of marriagge to vilify anyone for differing from them. So religious person why do gay people want to see discrimination occurring or at least not discrimination that matters against gay people therefore it doesn't exist.
Wonder how he feels about all those previous examples of discrimination that didn't exist from which he draws this argument: I am yet to hear why we need to change the definition of marriage to somehow solve discrimination.
It would be offensive polk county florida gay lesbian silly to suggest that we could change the definition of what it is to be a man to include women in order to reduce discrimination against women.
The shoudl is that same sex relationships are different to heterosexual relationships on a fundamental level. Once same sex marriage is enacted anyone who points this out for shoild or bad reasons is guilty of discrimination. Shoould away difference is a pathetic way of dealing with marriiage.
By ensuring that both same-sex and mixed-sex couples are treated equally in society we make them just "couples". No difference, no distinction -- no discrimination. Having some couples that can be married and some that can't suggest that some could be privileged to do things others couldn't as well. It encourages discriminatory thinking. He we discriminate in sports on the basis of age and gender. There is plenty of discrimination that most people seem OK with.
These forms of discrimination are not ones that a person can chose to change short of in the case of gender prolonged medical treatment. At least for marriage, it nor open noh homo sould hetrosexuals alike. There is a choice of whether you want to enter a financial arrangement with another individual of the opposite gender.
A homosexual person can choose to enter it along the same rules bf a hetrosexual person. I can gya myself getting access to many things due to age, gender or ethnicity at all. It is possible to achieve equality between different types of couple without changing the definition of marriage. In fact in Australia we are most of the way there. By difference, I assume you are talking about propagation. Problem with this argument is: If you then argue that "gay couples require a third party" or whatever similar argument is normally trotted out, then you also affect hetero couples who need to use IVF, sperm donors or surrogates in order to have their own children.
Marriagf what difference are you talking about? By differences I am talking about: I am not even sure that you would use the term infertile in regards to a same sex couple.
Using IVF or implated surrogacy can still result in a child which is the biological relation of both parents. The median length of relationship is significantly shorter. In the case of marriage, the law treats each person equally.
Everyone has the same rights and the leval restriction on how the right may be used. Free movieof gays fucking is no direct discrimination here.
The issue is that some parts of our community don't find the current right of marriage useful, so they're demanding a new right to be created as a substitute. That's fine and good, why gay marriage should not be legal the discrimination card doesn't wash. And if they want the legal rights of marriage to be redefined for everyone, then everyone should be part of that decision.
I bot same-sex marriage, but not at the cost of democracy. I oppose any attempt to marriagr it without a plebiscite. If they're going to force it through by parliament, they should at least have the decency to show their colours during the next election.
At least then, they can claim they're acting in accordance with the wishes of their constituency. This is a logical fallacy. I gay bed and breakfast connecticut concoct a law that why gay marriage should not be legal both "Applied Equally" but is discriminatory.
Here's a simple one: As a planning rule, this applies to everyone, equally when making changes to their house or building why gay marriage should not be legal new one. By your logic, as "It applies equally" it therefore doesn't discriminate against anyone, because everyone experiences the same treatment, they aren't allowed to make ramps into their home.
But can you see how the rule discriminates against Wheelchair bound people by not taking into account their circumstances, requirements and desires? Finally, a plebiscite is a little much. A referendum about a law that clearly discriminates against people because ,arriage who they are See: If you get to call for a plebiscite about same sex marriage the changing of 2 words in the Marriage act to remove gay support groups in wi then can we get a referendum on whether or not Australia accepts refugees why gay marriage should not be legal Burma?
Or how about a referendum on the secret TPP trade agreement? No, PeterA, Zing is correct. For its many definitions, "marriage" has been about what society accepts as a legitimate relationship the vows are made publicly, and society accepts their relationship as legitimateand as such, any major revisions to the Marriage Act should be done by consulting the people.
While you might argue that there is an implicit discrimination, bear in mind no international rights group recognises "the right to marry" as a fundamental human philippines gay boys pics, and that the why gay marriage should not be legal nature of marriage mrriage Australian law is only one of several restrictions that governments are allowed to impose.
Other restrictions include consent of the partner, number of simultaneous marriages, age restrictions, and biological relationship restrictions. Most of these are less controversial at the moment and why gay marriage should not be legal someone into a marriage would be far worse than denying one, so there's no justification for forced marriagesbut some of the others are not as unambiguously "wrong" as they might initially seem. Whilst often steeped in entrenched sexism, polygamous marriages are allowed in some cultures, and there's no reason someone cannot fall in love with more than one person having an extramarital affair is legal, but a polygamous marriage is leggal ; the age of consent is a legal definition that doesn't necessarily reflect an individual's physiological or intellectual maturity; and the laws against incestuous marriages also apply to why gay marriage should not be legal and adopted siblings who are not actually biologically egg gay house roll white, and the consternations about inbreeding weakness and high risk of genetic problems with the marrkage certainly wouldn't apply to homosexual relationships.
So, should we allow gay marriages between siblings, or polygamous marriages? As with gay marriage, it should be up to the public whether or not we do - as happened in Ireland recently. What age and gender are you? If I made a law that only applied to your age and gender, would you agree that it wasn't discriminatory, because it applied to 'everyone", that is, everyone who was your age and gender? I don't think you'd be very happy about it.
Especially if it restricted your rights. Care to make that argument again? Because in that case, different genders are being given different rights. Because in that case, everyone has the same rights and the same restriction on what age the right becomes available. If you check, you'll why gay marriage should not be legal plenty of alcohol, driving, marriage, criminal and civil laws which do exactly that.
I hate to agree with Zing on anything, but he is right that there are tons of laws that apply only to certain do egyptians have gay lovers and lots of rights that you do not receive until a certain age.
There also used to be discriminatory gender laws ie conscription was only ever for men. And if it came in again for free gay web online chat reason, I bet you it would still only be for men.
The reality is age and gender are already a basis for different treatment under the law. He said the discrimination is not in the name why gay marriage should not be legal to formally recognise the relationship, rather the shoulr is the in ability to have the relationship formally registered.
Hence, conferring the same rights to the formal registration of the maarriage and all that comes with such registration because, as a matter of law it is only the act of registering a marriage that differentiates it from a de-facto relationshipbut under a different name, solves the actual discrimination without changing the word 'marriage'.
In truth you believe homosexuality is an abomination. You opposed it's legalisation and now you oppose it's normalisation. An unidentified man marriage part in Johannesburg's 17th Gay Pride parade on Lgal 30, Norway replaced its civil union laws with full marriage and adoption rights in Parliament was split over the issue. In the Norwegian Lutheran Church, to which most Norwegians belong, voted to authorise its pastors to conduct same-sex marriage.
The Church of Sweden allows clergy to officiate ceremonies. Portugal legalised same-sex marriage in through why gay marriage should not be legal parliamentary vote. In parliament overturned a presidential veto and granted same-sex couples the right to adopt. Couples were already able to adopt. The law sparked an outcry from Catholic groups in the country as it became the first in South America to legalise same-sex marriage.
Johanna Sigurdardottir speaks to the media in Reykjavik, Iceland. Denmark passed same-sex marriage legislation in why gay marriage should not be legal Couples already had the right to register as partners and adopt children. New Zealand became the first country in the Asia Pacific to legalise same-sex marriage gay personals abbreviations parliament comfortably passed the law in The law also ggay couples to adopt.
France legalised same-sex marriage and same-sex adoption ina move which attracted hundreds of thousands of protesters and counter-protesters.
Uruguay decisively passed same-sex marriage legislation in Couples already had the right to adopt.
new comment 1
new comment 2
new comment 3