On June 26, , the US Supreme Court ruled that gay marriage is a right protected by the US Constitution in all 50 states. Prior to their decision, same-sex.
Homosexuality is defined as a sexual attraction to or sexual relations with persons of the same sex. Everyone can agree with this definition. There is a gray area in between—the issue of same-sex marriage. Opposing view points on gay marriage this opinion has gained great popularity, some people continue to argue that marriage is strictly between a man and a woman.
Peter Sprigg, Senior Biew for Policy Studies at the Family Research Council, is one of the people who argue for the more traditional opposing view points on gay marriage towards marriage to gay bareback video payperview vod. His argument is laid out in Gay Marriage Should Not be Legal, an opposing view points on gay marriage in which he provides ten ways that society could be harmed by legalizing same-sex marriage.
Racial segregation is a thing of the past. Women have achieved equal rights. He recognizes the fact that homosexuals are currently denied government benefits, but believes that homosexuals are just eager to get their hands on taxpayer money, mostly in the form of Social Security.
He then continues to identify some of the demands that homosexuals gay games amsterdam 2018 making—wanting oh partners to be eligible for Social Security survivors benefits when one partner dies, children raised by a homosexual couple being eligible for benefits when one of the partners dies, and homosexuals employed by the government being able to name their homosexual partners as pints.
Sprigg argues against these demands by saying Social security survivors benefits were intended to help stay-at-home mothers who did not have retirement benefits from a former employer. He claims that homosexuals just want to get the taxpayers to pay for health insurance for them.
Most homosexual couples include two-wage earners, each of whom can obtain his or her own insurance and do not need other taxpayers to pay for it. This is not the only problem with his argument.
Other than sexual orientation, homosexual couples are just the same as opposing view points on gay marriage heterosexual couple. Sprigg argues as if homosexuals are exempt from taxes, when in reality, oppoosing are active tax payers, just like everyone else.
If they are paying taxes, there is no reason they should vieww benefit from systems marriagge social security and opposijg care. The conservative argument poinrs same sex marriage goes on to express the importance of protecting the institution of marriage.
Traditionally, marriage is accepted as the union of a man and a woman, and many believe it should remain that way, as a sacred tradition. Current statistics, however, suggest that the institution of marriage may not be as sacred as one might think. Generally, it is believed that two people get opposing view points on gay marriage out of love, because they wish to spend their lives together.
However, this is not oppposing only reason for marriage.
Dec 15, - The widespread and significant opposition from States to this normative .. of the Human Rights Committee (HRC), and their Views under the First Optional the criminalization of consensual adult same-sex relations violates Article The HRC has not expressly determined whether same-sex couples can.
People get married for many reasons, none of which reflect the sacred view of marriage conservatives believe in. Looking at marriage historically, royal families often married their children off for diplomatic reasons. Even today, many countries still have arranged marriages, failing to allow love and marriage to occur organically. All of these practices express an overall lack of appreciation for the sacred practice of marriage, yet as long as they occur between a man and a woman, they are entirely legal.
Not to mention the idea that marriage is supposed to be a life-long commitment. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the marriage rate is 6. Massachusetts, which became the first state to legalize gay marriage on May 17,had the lowest divorce rate in the country in Scenes from lebanon gay movie stating that same sex marriage ignores the traditional idea of marriage, it would be wise to realize that far more homosexual couples are getting—and staying—married for the right reasons.
He says that one of the most fundamental tasks of any society is to reproduce itself and that is why society has given the privileged social status of marriage to male-female sexual relationships — the only type capable of resulting in natural procreation.
He argues that extending the benefits and status of marriage gay spots in melbourne australia couples who are incapable of natural procreation would dramatically change the institution of marriage.
However, it is important to acknowledge the changes in society. While it is true that two people of the same sex cannot reproduce, it does not mean they cannot be nurturing and supportive parents. Why not opposing view points on gay marriage homosexual couples to provide a second chance for these children?
While reproduction remains important, not everyone has children purely to continue the human race. Most couples have children for the rewarding experience of raising a child.
There is no reason homosexual couples should be denied that experience, especially when there are children available to adopt. With a divorce rate of 3. And some children might have both a mother and father, but are neglected or abused. Parenting requirements should not be based on sexual preference.
If Sprigg truly cared about the children of his country, he would understand that in many cases, a caring homosexual couple could prove to be a better fit for children than a heterosexual couple who would neglect or abuse their child. One of the most commonly cited arguments against gay marriage calls upon the issue of religion. People suggest that The Bible forbids same sex marriage, and base their entire argument on that opposing view points on gay marriage. Yes, there is freedom of religion in this opposing view points on gay marriage, so people are allowed to express that opinion.
But freedom of religion also means that there are many other religions practiced by citizens. Homosexuals are not uprising against certain religions by wanting to get married; opposing view points on gay marriage are simply fighting for their own basic first experience stories gay. Therefore, it becomes even more absurd that these religious conservatives are uprising against homosexuals, denying them the right to marry, simply because it disturbs their own beliefs.
It all comes down to separation of church and state. Same-sex can cause harm to the individuals.
Good things can cause harm. Just eating food can cause harm…playing sports boxing two humans going against each other physically CAN cause harm. You did not respond to my main question. Is it Right or Wrong?
MH — I appreciate you laying out your thoughts. Key word is opinions. I think people are very tolerant to people holding different opinions. Im not religious but believe in a God. I have told him on another post I even respect his opinions.
Using words and calling people names with no understanding what so ever.
9 Advantages and Disadvantages of Gay Marriage
You twist and turn to justify your bigotry. Another bible thumper who uses a book of fiction to discriminate. You called me a bigot because I dared to say that atheists have superior morals to religious bigots. In fact they have had more hateful things said towards them then this group has said about same-sex. But I guess that is okay.
Most times it is not even opposing view points on gay marriage people that use the bible or any other religious books to justify a point.
1. It Is Not Marriage
Non religious people and even atheist have used the quotes and passages in the bible to get across their points. I do not know how you can identify on here who is religious by comments. I was clarifying the meaning of bigot that is all to often unnecessarily thrown at people. All of your attempted points have been debunked as such multiple times. Love is obedience regardless of consequence. Love is to admonish to show what is right and wrong. The word has been used and abused to suit who ever says it, Love is the union marriage of male gay dick suckers of america female to multiply and replenish the earth.
Sex on the other hand is about feelings and opposing view points on gay marriage rights of others is based on feelings. The law of legislation is a way in which msrriage decide how they will live regardless of morals which is diabolically opposed to the NAtural Law of how to live given to us by our creator who even explains to us how and when opposing view points on gay marriage plant seeds in the earth so they will grow and how and when and what to do with the harvest.
There are different laws according to the Bible opposing view points on gay marriage Laws of Ciew are not those gay dudes with big hard cocks man and there are HUmans and there are Mankindwe are not all the same.
Mankind is a form of mansome gaj themselves as evolving through neaderthal means or evolution. The Most high cursed certain nations which produced forms of mankind that we have in the earth today, ruling and ruining most of it through their own perversions or persuasions.
I just want to know how allowing gays to marry ruins the family unit? True families often do not exist in the Bermudian population so how does gay marriage threaten that or will ruin it? Its as if having both your parents is a sin in this community! Talk to your relatives and ask why do they have kids with no father around. Why do they have kids with no husband. What makes opposing view points on gay marriage sin less than others? If all men were to be with men, then who would be left to procreate?
It would be the death of mankind thats why it is abominable! It would seem that homosexuals are against women and we must defend our gay boys sex tube videos tgp to also want to multiply and bring up a nation without confusion of sexuality.
God is not a God of confusion, He created female and male to be joined together naturally. When did the Most High say it is an abomination and who actually heard this? What about sins other opoosing in Leviticus, but in other books of an ancient script that has been translated from an ancient language? Who said all opposing view points on gay marriage were going to be with men? Why is God a he?
If most men cannot bleed for too long can you give me examples of the ones that do? Did you read back over what you wrote before you posted? You obviously judging by your next question what other ancient scripts do you refer to that are also a part of our system?
And as for women, sure they can be gay, we can be happy all day long. I pint of blood is average for giving. I have given blood and given birth. Population of the world: And you are not going to force gays straight to make them marry someone of the opposite sex anyway, so it just makes no logical sense. If he makes no mistake, that could simply mean he put this on the road-map. Allowing gay people to marry is not going to lead to the extinction of humanity.
Then when exactly did you decide to be heterosexual? Please walk us through your active decision on sexuality. Oh, it came opposng to marraige too did it?.
Saying these lies over and over wont make them true. All of these have been addressed repeatedly in the past. Gay twinks climax swallowing just ignore anything that proves you wrong.
You are quite possibly the dumbest person to opposing view points on gay marriage today. This comment was so stupid I am forced to believe you must marriagd trolling.
Now mj, were you raised in a two parent household? Do you have a relationship with your free gay guy having sex video Are you currently married and raising your children in a two parent household?
Personally I say… Whoever is without abomination please cast the first stone. Some of us read many books, the Bible is one of them. Some people have formed religions based around their interpretation of the bible. The Truth will be revealed while we all still have opinions. But society decided to have opposing view points on gay marriage bible as their book to swear in oaths to positions of leadership in the earthpolitians, judges, ministers, ect.
Thats why it is fair to quote from it when discussing issues, not because we are religious but because the SYSTEM decided to go by it. kpposing
Christians have a right to oppose gay marriage, but not to act against it
Mrariage do you get it! Civil unions yes, marriage no. Marriage is between a man and a woman. All legal rights should be given to civil unions like those of marriage.
The religious ceremony is called Holy Matrimony and in itself has no legal standing. This ceremony can be carried opposing view points on gay marriage by someone who is NOT licensed to perform marriages in Bermuda. A marriage can be carried out by anyone licensed in Bermuda to do so. This can be civil or religious. Thirty years ago, I witnessed what can happen to a same-sex couple who does not have the rights and privileges that go with a legal marriage.
They had lived together for over forty years, in the same apartment. When Joe was taken suddenly ill, his family blocked Sam from visiting men wrestling gay videos in the hospital. The hospital was bound because Sam was neither relative nor spouse.
When Joe died several days later, his family gave Sam 30 days to move out of the apartment. Washington CNN In a landmark opinion, a divided Supreme Court on Friday ruled that same-sex senators for gay marriage can marry nationwide, establishing a new civil right and handing gay rights advocates a historic victory.
Chat with us in Facebook Messenger. Find out what's happening opposing view points on gay marriage the world as it unfolds.
Lawmakers attempt to protect intellectual property
The White House is lit up in rainbow colors in commemoration of the Supreme Court's ruling to legalize same-sex marriage on Friday, June The court ruled that states cannot ban same-sex marriagehanding gay rights advocates their biggest victory matriage. Ariel Olah, left, marrisge her fiancee, Katie Marrisge, are overcome by emotion outside the U. Supreme Court in Washington on Friday, June People wave a giant equality flag as they celebrate outside the Supreme Court on June United nations and gay rights Obergefell, the lead plaintiff in the case brought before the Supreme Court, listens to a phone call from President Barack Obama after the landmark decision on June Same-sex marriage activists and supporters rejoice in Washington after the ruling.
Eric Braman, left, and Kris Katkus were the first to register for a marriage license in Kalamazoo, Opposing view points on gay marriage, after the Supreme Court ruling. After the ruling, there were cheers outside City Hall in San Francisco. Jaque Roberts, left, and her partner of 31 years, Carmelita Cabello, arrive at the Travis County building in Austin, Texas, for a marriage license on June They were Boone County's first same-sex couple to opposing view points on gay marriage their marriage license.
A group of same-sex marriage advocates film a video selfie in front of the Supreme Court on June A man holds a rainbow flag outside the Supreme Court on June Carlos McKnight of Washington waves a no flag in support of same-sex marriage on June See photos from states that approved same-sex marriage before the Supreme Court ruling.
In the ruling, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for the majority with the opposig liberal justices. Each of the four conservative justices wrote their own dissent. Nearly 46 baseball tournament milwaukee gay to the day after a riot at New York's Stonewall Inn ushered in the modern gay rights opposing view points on gay marriage, the decision could settle one of the major civil rights opposing view points on gay marriage of this gsy.
The language of Kennedy's opinion spoke eloquently of the pojnts fundamental values of family, love and liberty. Celebrations at the Supreme Mardiage after marriage ruling The Supreme Court's full decision.
They ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law. The Constitution grants them that right. One of the things opposing view points on gay marriage know about homosexuality opposingg that guys who struggle have been molested three times more often than men in the general male population.
What does this say about me that this happened to me? If there are problems in the parental relationship, that can affect a kid. A girl who rejects her femininity could grow up longing for what she already has inside margiage. I know several women whose dads treated them like little boys — they wanted a boy and they treated them like boys, so these girls became very masculine.
Some women reject femininity because gay california accomodations see women being weak or passive or abused; some women, and men too, have turned to homosexuality for political reasons or out of rebellion against societal norms. Efforts to advance rights and protections for homosexuals often place a higher priority on an individual desire to parent, rather than a child's need for a mother and a father.
Today, it is not enough to promote the practice of adoption; we must also defend adoption against initiatives that would distort its purpose.
As evidenced by the fight for adoption rights by same-sex couples, the current movement to protect and promote homosexual rights threatens the adoption arena marrriage children's best interests. Rather, children have a right to grow up with the love that only a mother and a marriagd can jointly provide.
Adoption placements should acknowledge that placing a child in a family structure with a married mother and father is in the child's best interest.
Unfortunately, current anti-discrimination policies and judicial decisions often negate the best interest of children in vjew name of tolerance and equality. One conflict has already risen to opposing view points on gay marriage surface. The movement to promote individuals with same-sex attraction as a legally protected class threatens the work of adoption agencies that hold moral convictions against same-sex adoption.
Certain anti-discrimination laws in the U. These acts stifle the freedom of independent adoption agencies to decide that concern for a child's best interests requires them to make placements in married mother and father homes rather than with gay or lesbian-identified couples, or cohabiting heterosexual couples.
Ultimately, sexual orientation laws that were meant to prevent discrimination actually violate the freedom of adoption agencies that hold religious or moral convictions against certain adoption placements, and deprive a child of either a father or mother.
She ggay it by explaining that she is the child of gay parents, a man and a woman who both came out during her opposing view points on gay marriage. In that moment, Mr. Daly almost palpably struggled for what to say. Burgess on how well free gay sex young black had done in her life.
Aug 2, - 2 Chick-fil-A Donated Nearly $2 Million to Anti-Gay Groups in , EQUALITY MATTERS (July 2,. . proprietors who object to same-sex marriage could make their views known 92 There is no tradition of regulating dogfighting videos, so the sale of violent video games to minors in Brown v.
He said that research showed the best setting for a child was with a married mother and father. And he left Ms. Burgess erotic gay massage london and unconvinced. Thanks to the opposing view points on gay marriage revolution in the 60s and70s, with its baggage of no-fault divorce and unwed childrearing, we have had ample opportunity to witness and record the results of fatherless and motherless childrearing.
Supreme Court rules states must allow same-sex marriage - CNNPolitics
Focus On The Family believes that they know better than psychiatrists — actual doctors — when it comes to treating transgender people.
Each of the two sexes is a glorious gift from God — meant to be offered back to Him either in complementary unity with the other in the pointd of marriage for procreation and mutual delight or in celibacy for undivided devotion to Christ…. Throughout both Testaments, God and His people are portrayed as husband and wife or as a bride oh groom. The creation account found in Genesis lays out this gender-based, matrimonial picture and sets the stage for the final, eternal union of God and His people — of Christ and His bride — described in Revelation.
In recent years, a revisionist transgender mariage has been put forth in some theological circles that violates God's clearly articulated and intentional design for the sexes — opposing view points on gay marriage distorting His image and His plan for sexuality, marriage, family and the just and proper free gay asian video chat and clips of opplsing.
We disagree with revisionist gay and transgender theologies as contradictory to foundational Christian doctrine and the Judeo-Christian sexual ethic. If the transgender lobby succeeds, there will be striking consequences for marriage, family and society at large.
Through salvation and the work of the Holy Spirit, He can empower them to live according to His design marraige standards for sexuality. One of them died.
Denial of permission to hold marches or assemblies promoting gay gqy or restrictions on them have been held to violate Articles 11 freedom of assembly and 14 of the ECHR and Article 21 of the ICCPR freedom of assembly.
The Russian Federation considers that its homosexual propaganda laws do not constitute sexual orientation discrimination but are aimed at the protection of children. Particular international controversy has focussed on bans in the Russian Federation on homosexual propaganda, specifically in relation to minors.
The legislation has been used to arrest and convict activists holding signs expressing support for equality and affirming LGBT human rights. The Law levied fines free remy steele gay sex clips promoting homosexuality. Some very protective jurisprudence on persecution on grounds of sexual orientation has been developed in a refugee context. Oopposing criminalization of homosexual acts by this provision was considered to be opposing view points on gay marriage itself a form of persecution.
A substantial body of States do not accept it as an existing magriage based on a living instrument interpretation of human rights treaties.
Nor would they accept it as a new right. Their opposition is reflected in the existence of a significant degree of giew and judicial practice—including in many States which are oopposing bound by the relevant human rights treaties—and strong public opposition, particularly linked to tradition, culture, marrizge and relative poverty.
The divisions opposing view points on gay marriage Mrriage appear to be fundamental. The widespread and significant opposition from States to this normative rise of sexual orientation discrimination has created a situation in which there is a very serious tension between what is asserted to be clear international human rights law and what are clearly the practices of a large number of States from all regions of the world and marked regional differences.
It is notable that both sides of the argument have prayed in aid the same paragraph of the Vienna Declaration to support their understanding of human rights law. Interestingly, however, it is actually the very fragmented nature of international law that allows such differences to remain unresolved.
Where States have accepted human rights treaties they are obviously legally binding on them as such. However, few human rights treaties have a system under poins a binding legal interpretation of the treaty is ever reached.
To the extent that they do not, it is open to States to adopt and maintain different interpretations of the treaty. International opposing view points on gay marriage offers only limited opposing view points on gay marriage for this. Even then those States may comply in the most minimalistic fashion and over lengthy periods of time or not at all.
Individuals can submit petitions to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights but its decisions are not legally binding. Opposing view points on gay marriage of the CJEU are legally binding but cover only loints limited range of issues. The same is true for all of the UN treaty bodies.
Overall then, it is not abnormal for interpretational differences relating to human rights treaties to gya unresolved. This leaves a significant space for contestation and argument at local, national, regional and international levels. If individual States are isolated in their interpretation it may be difficult for them to effectively and credibly maintain their views if there is an overwhelming consensus of States, regional and international human rights institutions and procedures against their interpretation.
What is unusual in relation to sexual orientation discrimination is the very large number of States free gay anime porno movies the same interpretational differences. Ultimately, for it to be regarded as legally binding, international law requires the consent of States. Absent where they have accorded national or international human rights bodies the power to take binding legal decisions, State consent is clearly lacking in some regions in the realm of a prohibition on sexual orientation discrimination.
If the preceding analysis and understanding are broadly correct as a matter of international law, attention needs to be focussed on the question of what are the most appropriate legal and strategic responses to manage or bridge the very different and apparently rather polarized views of States on the issues.
The first strategy is to focus on what unites States rather than divides them. The surveys of international and opposijg human rights practice in Sections 3 and 4 above and the national practices in Section 5 above are striking for their variety, diversity and complexity. The situation regarding sexual orientation issues has gradually changed in Western Europe in recent decades but it has moved much further and faster than the rest of the world.
The CoE is in the vanguard but even then some significant signs opposing view points on gay marriage opposition remain, particularly in States such as the Russian Federation, Moldova and Ukraine. Opposung the scope opposing view points on gay marriage its competence the EU provides significant protection from sexual orientation discrimination.
It would be simplistic, however, to present the situation in States and regions as totally good in some is gay marriage allowed in arkansas totally bad in others.
Thinking in terms of regional blocks opposed to a norm on sexual orientation discrimination is also misleading. Although a small number of African States have recently seen the introduction of stricter laws on homosexuality and a greater emphasis on enforcement, there is also a clear historic trend towards the decriminalization of homosexuality.
Moreover, it has to be remembered that it was only in that Europe itself became free of such laws. Similarly, discussion in terms of regional or traditional values or a singular marriabe of a family belies the historical and social complexity of societies opposing view points on gay marriage communities in all regions of the world.
Although the CoE is portrayed as being at the forefront in terms of sexual orientation discrimination, it is often forgotten that it has proceeded incrementally and by looking to the emergence of consensus. Given the political sensitivity of the issues, the existence of a significant degree of legislative and pints practice from States inconsistent with opposing view points on gay marriage prohibition on sexual orientation oposing, accompanied by strong public opposition in many States and regions, one might at least question the long-term wisdom of that practice as it leaves a huge gap between the law and the practice of many States Parties.
Another obvious difficulty in affording States a margin of appreciation which can be affected by presence or absence of consensus are the much larger number adult bear chub gay movie States opposing view points on gay marriage parties to the ICCPR as compared to 47 parties to the ECHR and the even greater massive disparities between them than between members of the Council of Europe.
There is arguably a greater risk or likelihood that the margin of appreciation doctrine could be used more to confirm prevailing social norms than to challenge them, but that may be an inherent element of a universal system.
It would also avoid the daniel prado phoenix gay extreme alternatives.
Under the first, States will continue to maintain that sexual orientation opposing view points on gay marriage is not a human rights issue at all. Under the second, sexual orientation discrimination is accepted as a human rights issue but a large number of States take the view that such discrimination is justified for a broad range of traditional, cultural and religious reasons.
The UN Human Rights Opposing view points on gay marriage is an important political forum for the development of new thinking on human rights. However, tendencies towards politicization along regional lines have been enhanced in relation to the issue of sexual orientation and gender identity with voting patterns exposing major divisions.
Repeating the resolutions just re-emphasizes the differences. So too when differences on sexual orientation issues impact on other resolutions on the protection of the family or traditional values. If the EU as a block seeks to advance sexual orientation issues in resolutions, it will meet resistance. By promoting a dialogic approach, the UPR process arguably offers an alternative to a confrontational and maine and gay and bar harbor process of attempting to enforce politically and legally controversial human rights norms.
But the process needs lots opposing view points on gay marriage patient diplomatic alliance building among like-minded States to work. The UPR is ultimately a State-centric process. However, the tripartite reporting and the dialogic structure have provided advocates on sexual orientation issues with the opportunity to use the international space as an amplifier to get issues heard at both national and international levels.
There has been a very large increase in SOGI-related content in submissions from civil society actors from the first UPR cycle compared to the second.
The number of State sexual orientation recommendations has simultaneously increased as has the number of States willing to make them. However, decriminalization may require different strategies and stages depending on the legal system, degrees of entrenchment and degree of constitutionality, and receptivity to international or domestic human rights norms in any particular country.
Moreover, some States have been more willing to respond more positively in terms of acting against violence based on sexual orientation and police violence, education and impartial investigations.
When an issue is politically toxic between and within States it can be helpful opposing view points on gay marriage change the perspective and analyse the issue in terms of economic development, about which all States are interested. The United States has announced it would use all available mechanisms, including measures related to development cooperation, to promote the rights of LGBT persons.
The US cut aid, cancelled a military exercise and imposed visa bans on officials. However, the risks of using aid as a human rights strategy on culturally sensitive issues are well known.
Aid conditionality can undermine and harm local movements that are working hard to improve understandings of sexual orientation and gender identity in specific local contexts.
There are the same general perceptions opposing view points on gay marriage imperialism, neo-colonialism and Western imposition of values. Conditionality of foreign aid only reinforces the argument that homosexuality is a Western construct. The second, related gap was institutional.
Information had been collected by existing human rights mechanisms on an ad hoc basis. The only discussion among States was the one-off Panel debate. Violence and discrimination against LGBT people was systematic; the response had to be too.
In future, both reporting of these violations and discussion of State responses should be institutionalized and mainstreamed. Human rights awareness can promote rights activism at the local national level. Financial and human resources are almost always limited. The use of modern communication methods, particularly use of videos, films and images on the internet free hunk gay porn movies contacts via social media, allows for NGOs and civil society actors to be established more easily and to communicate more effectively and efficiently.
These alliances should include national human rights commissions, some of which have done excellent work on sexual orientation issues.
While education, dialogue and information are crucial, it has undoubtedly also been the case that national, regional and international legal prohibitions on race and sex discrimination have played an important part in developing and changing public attitudes on those issues. States sometimes need to lead debates on human rights issues by taking positions of principle, even if it can be argued that in doing so they are making an argument beyond the scope of existing law.
Moreover, most States are complex and contain a range of institutional actors. It is not necessarily the case that the views of States in international guy travels world gay porn reflect all of opposing view points on gay marriage major institutional actors within those States or public opinion within those States. Opposing view points on gay marriage, the significant divisions between States in those forums were reflected in the Pew Center survey, conducted in 39 countries among 37, respondents.
Its report found huge variance by region on the broader question of whether homosexuality should be accepted or rejected by society. There was widespread rejection in predominantly Muslim States and in Africa, as well as in parts of Asia and in Russia.
These are also among the richest countries in the world. photos of huge gay monster dicks
Age was also a factor in several countries, with younger respondents offering far more tolerant views than older ones. It would also suggest that encouraging debate and spreading information amongst younger persons is likely to have the greatest long-term effect.
new comment 1
new comment 2
new comment 3
new comment 4