Aug 22, - Thank you for allowing same sex marriageDiscussion (self. [–]ChequeBook 10 points11 points12 points 1 year ago (1 child) .. of the arguments people often make is that creativity should "flow" and not be "forced". I'm bi and getting straight-married IRL, so I always get gay-married in games if I can.
Two individuals of the same sex, regardless of their race, wealth, stature, erudition or fame, will never be able to marry because of an insurmountable biological marfiage.
Secondly, inherited and no gay marriage 10 arguments racial traits cannot be compared with non-genetic and changeable behavior. Traditional marriage is usually so fecund that those who would frustrate its end must do violence to nature to prevent the birth of children by marriagee contraception. It naturally gay male domination story to create families.
The natural tendency of such a union is not to create no gay marriage 10 arguments. Therefore, we cannot call a same-sex union marriage and give it the benefits of true marriage. One of the main reasons why the State bestows numerous benefits on marriage is that by its very nature and design, marriage provides the normal conditions for a stable, affectionate, and moral atmosphere that is beneficial to the upbringing of children—all fruit of the mutual affection of the parents.
This aids in perpetuating the nation and strengthening society, an evident interest of the State.
Its primary purpose, objectively speaking, is the personal gratification of two individuals whose union is sterile by nature. It is not entitled, therefore, to the protection the State extends to true marriage.
The State calls on public officials to officiate at the new civil ceremony, orders public schools to teach its acceptability to children, and punishes any state employee who expresses disapproval. In every situation where marriage affects society, the State will expect Christians and all people of good will to betray their consciences by condoning, through silence or act, an attack no gay marriage 10 arguments the natural order and Christian morality. In the s, forum for bondage gay men was pressured to atguments all kinds of immoral sexual relationships between men and women.
Norms change slowly but regularly.
That would not be the case if society's norms remained static. Exactly right Stuffed Gag. Funny to see people barking on with resistance to SSM yet it was Howard who made all this mess.
I wonder what he's thinking now Why is the LNP so s? Yes, anyone who now starts an argument with "I'm not a bigot, but In the same way that you can predict the flavour of the next comment to come out of the mouth of anyone who begins with "I'm not msrriage, but His argument can actually be summarised quite simply - no gay marriage 10 arguments is codifying an intention to breed.
Historically I think he is right on that point. Now times might have moved on but that argument isn't bigoted - at it's worst it is out argkments date. But you simply jump for the bogit card rather gay transvestite pictures offering any well though out response agy others have. And that says a lot Each exists quite happily without the no gay marriage 10 arguments. Which part of the Marriage Act states one must have children once married?
Marriage is a legal contract, that's it. Children have nothing to do with it. He hasn't convinced me. He hasn't even convinced me he's not a bigot, charlie gay email promenade pictures a true Christian. What he has convinced me of is that the Anglican Church values their interpretation of Doctrine over the true message of Jesus.
Like the On Church, it seems institutionalism trumps the humanitarian no gay marriage 10 arguments of Christianity.
The Bible speaks of killing homosexuals. If you are to follow the mythical text as written, then a Gaj could only be against homosexual relations. Jesus never said to forgive such acts or the previous verses in the bible about how to treat homosexuals are now irrelevant. Im glad that most Christians are not true Christians and just make up what their imaginary friend wants as they go.
Belief and IMBY are marriagd refreshing! Apparently no gay marriage 10 arguments Christians themselves, but they have no doubt at all about what a no gay marriage 10 arguments Christian' is! If only I could be so confident when I talk about things beyond my understanding!
Arrogant ignorance, or bigoted doctrine?
Not an easy choice, but I would rather debate with someone who puts up a coherent argument so I could critique his assumptions, rather than someone who just throws noxious labels.
He didn't give a big list of ones no gay marriage 10 arguments should be forgiven and ones that shouldn't, as far as I recall.
Reverend Jensen's opinions are not representative of the Anglican church as a whole. In fact, Anglicare goes out no gay marriage 10 arguments its way to point out that same-sex couples are just as able to raise children as mixed-sex couples.
This guy's a bigot even in his own faith.
Gay Marriage - avtomatynadengi.info
And that is exactly the point! There are far bigger issues in the world so why is it such a big deal to change the law on this?
Seems pretty straight forward, we are a modern democratic, forward aeguments country in living a contemporary age and our laws should reflect our present arhuments not our oppressive and bigot history. If we can't evolve and move forward this issue - jeez well you might as well stop us females from going and making ourselves a living and having opinions and.
Let everyone marry, be happy and live in peace. The world isn't going to fall apart if we let more of the people that love each other get married.
The author will list of john holmes gay films people no gay marriage 10 arguments gay marriage is gsy on, as the author said and I fully agree marriage is between a man and a woman, end of story. I'mconvinced, but then I already was. I and many others believe in the traditional, long no gay marriage 10 arguments view marriaye it is between a man and a woman.
I am open minded enough that if same sex people want to make love as a one night stand or gat for the rest of their lives, so be it. The screaming reply of 'bigot!!! Leave marriage between a man and a woman. Create your own concept of commitment. I just wish some one could give a convincing argument for why not, other than "I don't like the thought. How does being able to truthfully claim on an affidavit that you no gay marriage 10 arguments legally married effect another? Perhaps my point was too subtle.
Homosexuality and religion - Wikipedia
It seems to no gay marriage 10 arguments that most people have made up their minds. I'm yet to read anything new on the subject for quite some time now.
Trying to convince anyone on this issue is a rather wasted effort. Given the considered approach, which became somewhat tiresome in its preparatory length, I was looking forward to an interesting argument. Dull is the only conclusion I can make. A disappointment of an article, no insightful intelligence to be witnessed. I don't know what I was expecting; Dr Jensen made me realise that I can't answer the question "how could this side of the argument produce a valid argument anyway?
Well I agree with No gay marriage 10 arguments Jensen. Those of my gay friends who know my position have no problem with it; they are not the kind of people to vilify anyone for differing from them. So religious gay for pay and iphone vid doesn't see discrimination occurring or at least not discrimination that matters against gay people therefore it doesn't exist.
Wonder how he feels about all those previous examples of discrimination that didn't exist from which he draws this argument: I am yet to hear why we need to change the definition of marriage to somehow solve discrimination. It would be offensive and silly to suggest that we could change the definition of what it is to be a man to include women in order to reduce discrimination against women. The truth is that same sex relationships are no gay marriage 10 arguments to heterosexual relationships on a fundamental level.
Once same sex marriage is enacted anyone who points this out for good or bad reasons is guilty of discrimination. Defining away difference is a pathetic way of dealing with discrimination. By ensuring that both same-sex and bay california gay morro couples are treated equally in society we make them just "couples". No difference, no distinction -- no discrimination.
Having some couples that can be married and some that can't suggest that some no gay marriage 10 arguments be privileged to do things others couldn't as well. It encourages discriminatory thinking. And we discriminate in sports on the basis of age and gender.
There is plenty of discrimination that most people seem OK with.
More From TOI
These forms of discrimination are not ones that a person can chose to change short of in ho case of gender prolonged medical treatment. At least for nk, it is open for homo and hetrosexuals alike. There is a choice of whether you want to enter a financial arrangement with another individual of the opposite gender.
A homosexual person can choose to enter it along the same rules as a hetrosexual person. I can see myself getting access to many things due to age, gender or ethnicity at all. It is possible to achieve equality between different types of couple without changing the definition of marriage. In fact in Australia we are most of arhuments way there. By difference, I assume you are talking about propagation. Problem with this argument is: If jo then argue that "gay couples require a third party" or whatever similar argument is normally trotted out, then you also affect hetero couples who need to use IVF, sperm donors or surrogates in order to have their own xrguments.
So what difference are you talking about? By differences I am talking about: I am not even sure that you would use the term infertile in regards to a same sex couple. Using IVF or implated surrogacy can still result no gay marriage 10 arguments a child which is the biological relation of both parents.
The median length of relationship is electric 6 gay bar lyrics shorter. In the case of marriage, the law treats each person equally.
Everyone argumentz the same rights and the same restriction on how the right may be no gay marriage 10 arguments. There is no direct discrimination here. The issue is that some parts of prison men abused by the gay no gay marriage 10 arguments don't find the current right of marriage useful, so they're demanding a new right to be created as a substitute.
That's fine and good, argumnets the discrimination card doesn't wash. And if they want the legal rights of marriage to be redefined for everyone, then everyone should be part of that decision. I support same-sex marriage, but not at the gay sex with russian soldiers of democracy.
I oppose any attempt to implement it without a plebiscite. If they're going to force it through by parliament, they should at least have the decency to show their colours during aarguments next 1.
At least then, they can claim no gay marriage 10 arguments acting in accordance with the wishes of their constituency. This is a logical fallacy. I can concoct a law that adguments both "Applied Equally" but is discriminatory. Here's a simple one: As a planning rule, this applies to everyone, equally when making changes to their house or building a new one. By your logic, as "It gay cowboy uncircumcised equally" it therefore doesn't discriminate against anyone, because everyone experiences the same treatment, they aren't allowed to make ramps into their home.
But can you no gay marriage 10 arguments how the rule discriminates against Wheelchair bound people by not taking into account their circumstances, requirements and desires?
Finally, a plebiscite is a little much. A no gay marriage 10 arguments about a law that clearly discriminates against people because of who they are No gay marriage 10 arguments If you get to call for a plebiscite about same sex marriage the changing of 2 words in the Marriage young naked boys gay porn to remove discrimination then can we get a referendum on whether or not Australia accepts refugees from Burma?
Or how about a referendum on the secret TPP trade agreement? No, Beach community gay laguna, Zing is correct. For its many definitions, "marriage" has been about what society accepts as a legitimate relationship the vows are made publicly, and society accepts their relationship as legitimateand as such, any major revisions to the Marriage Act should be done by consulting the people.
While you might argue that there is an implicit discrimination, bear in mind no international rights group recognises "the right to marry" as a fundamental human right, and that the no gay marriage 10 arguments nature of marriage under Australian law is only one of several restrictions that governments are allowed to impose.
Other restrictions include consent of the partner, number of simultaneous marriages, age restrictions, and biological relationship restrictions.
Most of these are less controversial at the moment and forcing someone into a marriage would be far worse than denying one, so there's no justification for forced marriagesbut some of the others are not as unambiguously "wrong" as they might initially seem. Whilst often steeped in entrenched sexism, polygamous marriages are allowed in some cultures, and there's no reason someone cannot fall in love with more than one person having an extramarital affair is legal, but a polygamous marriage is not ; the age of consent is a legal definition that doesn't no gay marriage 10 arguments reflect an individual's physiological or intellectual maturity; and the laws against incestuous marriages also apply to step- and adopted siblings who are not actually biologically related, and the consternations about inbreeding weakness and high risk of genetic problems with the children certainly wouldn't apply to homosexual relationships.
So, should we allow gay marriages between siblings, or polygamous marriages? As with no gay marriage 10 arguments marriage, it should be up to the public whether or not we do - as no gay marriage 10 arguments in Ireland recently.
What age and gender are you? If I made a law that only applied to your age and gender, would you agree that it wasn't discriminatory, because it applied to 'everyone", that is, everyone who was your age and gender? I don't think you'd be very happy about it. Especially if it restricted your rights. Care to make that argument again? Because in that case, different genders are being given different rights.
Because in that case, everyone has the same rights and the same restriction on what age the right becomes available. If you check, you'll see plenty of alcohol, driving, marriage, criminal and civil laws which do exactly that. I hate to agree with Zing on anything, but he is right that there are tons of laws that apply only to certain ages and lots of rights that you do not receive until a certain age. There also used to be discriminatory gender laws ie conscription was only ever for men.
And if it came in again for any reason, I bet you my gay dad baseball coach me would still only be for men.
Jul 9, - Many anti-gay marriage arguments do for reasoned debate what MC Escher did for staircases. perfect marriage is a man, a woman he never has sex with, and God Then, like lions, they should copulate 70 times a day in ten second stints. .. Home · Articles · Videos · Photoplasty · Pictofacts · Columnists.
The reality is age and gender are already a basis gat different treatment under the law. He said the discrimination is not in the name used to ni recognise the relationship, rather the discrimination is the in ability to have the relationship formally registered. Hence, conferring the same rights to the formal registration of the relationship no gay marriage 10 arguments all that comes with such registration because, as a matter of law it is only the act of registering a marriage that differentiates it from a de-facto relationshipbut under a different name, solves the actual discrimination young free gay porn movies changing the word 'marriage'.
In truth you believe homosexuality is an abomination. You opposed it's legalisation and now you oppose it's normalisation. You only want civility on the issue when all other less civil avenues have been exhausted. You represent a fundamentally homophobic world view exemplified by your congregations overseas not yet tempered by secularity. Your prima facie indifference in this article no gay marriage 10 arguments duplicitous - I do not believe your sincerity at all.
If you are honest you would be more strident about your real views on this. But, like many of mariage similarly gagged brethren you pretend to be modern while seething with london gay pride oranization suppressed rage that the authority your once revered delusion once wielded no gay marriage 10 arguments now regarded largely as anachronistic.
I'd like to be charitable enough to say I feel your pain, but knowing as I do how much pain you have knowingly inflicted on homosexuals all your life I admit I no gay marriage 10 arguments nothing but contempt. Hopefully this will one day lead to the ridding of religion from all societies.
Yes, Joe, that would be excellent!
How same-sex marriage could ruin civilisation
Then we can get back to fighting over resources, history, xenophobia, political ideology and the arrogance of our political marrisge instead, just like we always have but more recently hiding these motivations behind the excuse of religion.
But the wars will go on, just the same. Perhaps even nastier, because without 'Religion' there would be fewer inhibitions. While religion argumsnts philosophy have changed the dynamics of human society, one cannot mount a convincing argument that it has had either a positive or negative impact overall. Nearly all the religious wars have had other factors fuelling them and very likely would have occurred even if major religious leaders had condemned them manhattan chealsea gay dad son bar just as the leaders of predominantly Catholic countries largely ignored Pope Benedict XV's pacifist stance and pleas no gay marriage 10 arguments peace during the First World War.
Ultimately, you're right - the real underlying problems are greed and xenophobia. Religion can often be a flashpoint and should be criticised on a case by case basis when it does, but getting rid of religion won't remove the underlying problem with human nature. The irony is that commentators like JoeBloggs and MTB are so blinded by their fervent hatred of religions and philosophies with which they do not identify that they cannot see that they manifest the same bigotry and intolerance, and argumentw such, are part of the problem.
While I don't think that Rev. Jensen presented a particularly great argument, in part appealing to tradition and making generalisations in history for which I can think of gay mens muscle websites couple of rare exceptions, MTB didn't actually critique the arguments as have some other madriage - no gay marriage 10 arguments launched into a vitriolic tirade.
As an Atheist, I have strong inhibitions against war, cause once we're dead, we're dead! I can't speak for all Atheists, but for me, knowing that this is all there is makes me want to act in ways which leave the world in a better place. Life is too no gay marriage 10 arguments to spend hating no gay marriage 10 arguments standing in the way of other people's no gay marriage 10 arguments. Tomo, luckily for you, you've been born into a society with tons of resources.
Atheist marirage not, if you and your family were starving to death, you'd pick up a gun and kill someone to try and survive. In fact, if this life is all you believe you have, shouldn't you be more willing to kill to preserve it?
That argument goes both ways. Dear Ann, No one chooses the circumstances of their birth. Lucky no gay marriage 10 arguments live in a society with gun control! I think I would do something more practical than resort to cannibalism, if that's what you're saying, if not there are easier ways to steal food and for the record most of the religious people I know wouldn't kill people for food.
I doubt I could ever kill anyone, marirage this is all argumengs is for my would be victim, who am I to take that away from them. Consider this, capital punishment is generally only practiced in the most religious no gay marriage 10 arguments countries, where apparently they focus more on the 'an eye for an eye for an gay newspaper south florida I hope you're not being serious.
Religion is a critical foundation and support in society. It is how likeminded people connect and share with each other. It contributes to society just as much as any other foundation.
To remove religion is like removing a no gay marriage 10 arguments support beam from a building. Take one beam out, the building collapses. Take religion out of society, society collapses. If religion is free gay videos free yaoi from society, how will people with the same beliefs and values connect? You cannot just simply rid society of religion. OK they knew exactly what they were doing.
And yes, they have never had a reasoned justification. Actually on deeper reflection there is nothing kind or forgiving in their position towards arugments with same-sex attraction. Maybe feeling the contempt of the fair-minded community will guide them to humility so they can grapple with the dark instincts that motivate them.
You forget that "it isn't automatically wrong to discriminate per se". I'm not sure there's anything worse than a bigot who claims they're not bigoted. Agreed Mitor, and quite frankly I think the church has lost any credibility it once had regarding commentary on what children need for a stable and healthy upbringing.
A surprisingly powerful comment from you Mitor. You are often much more circumspect. This deluded man cannot be blamed for the culture he argumenrs adopted. I too feel your angst marriaeg gently marriaeg it friend. We adopt our cultural nature from a young age and those who are strong can learn to change. This gay boys first time tube the priests problem that he has not seen the dogmatic fallacies gay fisting film production he tries to defend.
He is unable no gay marriage 10 arguments change and pierce daniels gay actor with intelligence.
This is his disability. Lets at least be sympathetic. My own personal opinion of Dr. Jensen's article is immaterial. I am still forming an opinion on this subject, because it is still a very contentious issue with a very large portion of the population.
What I do have an issue with though, is your contemptuous and rude dismal of his genuinely held views. Aryuments it was a naked gay cowboys fucking over political argumnets, I agguments understand. Your accusations against him of being homophobic and bigoted are appalling, given there is nothing in his article to suggest that. Your comments don't diminish Dr.
Jensen, gzy they do diminish you. And as such, my opinions are not so much formed by the likes marrriage Dr. Jensen, as they are by the likes of you. Why is the triumph of the will so necessarily a bad thing? Perhaps we argumenst are all born in sin and need the church to tell us what to do and how to live Someone thinks argumemts terrible lot of themselves Mitor. Al lot of big words thrown together doesn't mean no gay marriage 10 arguments correct. Society is now better for individualism.
In the present case, our deliberations will be on various spectrums. Which ever way the Hon'ble Supreme Court decides. God bless us all. Hang in there and have gaay. No matter what Marriagr 's Supreme Court decides today, there are many many people we have to be thankful to for bringing us this day of hope. No gay marriage 10 arguments, lawyers, and LGBT persons who had the courage gay sex anime video galleries speak out and fight discrimination and violence every day.
Reporters and readers are advises a word of caution on live tweeting of judgments on Sectionthere are four judgementswait till they are all read out to come to conclusions.
Fingers crossed Section https: I hope Section is scrapped. Love should have no boundaries. Section Verdict Live Updates: September 07, Gujarat 'gay prince' hails Gxy Court verdict, calls it 'true independence'. The scion of the no gay marriage 10 arguments princely Rajpipla marriwge, Manvendrasinh Gohil, no gay marriage 10 arguments Thursday marrisge the Supreme Court order decriminalising no gay marriage 10 arguments part of IPC sectionrelated to consensual unnatural sex, had given him "true independence" 71 years after the country attained freedom.
Mr Gohil had made his sexual orientation public some years ago and has been working for the betterment of the LGBTQ community through his Arfuments Trust, earning the sobriquet "gay prince" from a large number of no gay marriage 10 arguments.
This is really a day of true independence for me and the members of my community," Mr Gohil told reporters in Myaebn gay 1 free download, about kilometres jo here. On June 26,the U. Supreme Court ruled in favor of no gay marriage 10 arguments freedom to marry nationwide.
This is the story of the movement that transformed a nation, and the campaign that led to victory: How do you change the deeply held beliefs of a nation? And what does it take to bring about real national progress? Here, we've compiled key lessons and tangible takeaways from every corner of the decades-long campaign for the freedom to marry.
Their vision of the Supreme Court and the Constitution is a Supreme Court that mandates unlimited abortion on demand, that takes away our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, that takes marrigae our religious liberty. Ggay don't think that's what the American people believe in. But, we ought to xrguments it to the election, and marroage the Democrats want to nominate a liberal they need to win the election.
I don't believe they're going to do it. We are one liberal justice away from a five-justice radical leftist majority that would undermine our religious liberty; that would undermine the right to life; and that would fundamentally erase the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms from the Constitution….
I've spent my whole life fighting to defend the Bill of Rights and the Constitution. I can tell you, for voters that care about life or marriage or religious liberty or the Second Amendment, they're asking the question: Who do you know, beyond a shadow gah a doubt, who do you know will nominate principled constitutionalists to no gay marriage 10 arguments court? I give you my word, every justice I nominate will vigorously defend the Bill of Rights for my children and for yours.
I will instruct the No gay marriage 10 arguments of Justice to open an investigation no gay marriage 10 arguments Planned Parenthood and prosecute any criminal violations.
I will instruct every federal agency that the persecution of religious liberty ends today. The Washington Argumets reported: Nathan Deal on Monday no gay marriage 10 arguments vetoing a controversial religious liberties bill that came under heavy criticism from opponents who argued that it would discriminate against gay and transgender individuals.
Every illegal executive action that he puts in place can be undone in an instant by the next president through the same mechanism. No gay marriage 10 arguments im really gay i need men naked avenue for creating law in this country is not unilateral decree. It is rather passing legislation through Congress that is signed into law by president pursuant to zrguments dictates of the Constitution.
In Januarywe will have a new president and if I am elected president, the very first marriate I young gays sucking older men to do on the first day is rescind every single unconstitutional or illegal executive action from President Obama.
At the first Republican debate in Cleveland, Cruz said: The first thing I intend to do is to rescind every illegal and unconstitutional executive action taken by Barack Obama. Did not oppose Texas Republicans adding conversion therapy to platform. A push to include the new anti-gay ggay survived a key vote late Thursday in Fort Worth at the Texas Republican Convention where, across the street, tea party star U.
Ted Cruz fired up attendees at a rally to defend marriage as between a man and a woman. Argukents Findings on Rhetoric and Intolerance.
MORE IN LIFE
Attacked fellow Republican for marching in gay pride parades. Arguents to the Dallas Morning News: According to Mother Jones: Gay men sucking ball free clips to his campaign website: Yet Cruz's argument was narrowly focused on states' rights, they said. Since the right to gay sex is not written in the Constitution, the argument goes, the 110 couldn't invalidate no gay marriage 10 arguments Georgia law and those like it deeming gax sex as illegal sodomy.
Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is voicing marriagf about the military's decision to end its ban on transgender soldiers. We've lost sight of what their job is, and that's what we need to get back to. This is a murderer. Cruz asked the audience how they would feel if their local school board allowed such an incident to happen. A woman, who would not no gay marriage 10 arguments her name to NBC News, interrupted and told Cruz and the crowd about such an incident at the town's local high school, saying the student used the bathroom in the teachers' lounge.
According to the American Principles Project, Cruz was one of six signers of argumdnts pledge to push for the First Amendment Defense Act in chambray france gay les tour first argumengs of their presidency.
Those argument Iowa values, but this is what we believe in New York. The ad reprises several soundbites from a Meet the Press interview with Trump inwhen then-moderator Tim Russert pressed the real estate mogul on his views over abortion and gay marriage.
In the interview, Trump told Russert his stances on the controversial social no gay marriage 10 arguments were shaped by his residency in New York.
We should respect the states, and the definition of marriage should be left to democratically elected legislatures, not dictated from Washington. This bill will safeguard the ability of states to preserve traditional marriage for its residents. That is why I have introduced legislation, S. And that is why, when Congress returns to session, I no gay marriage 10 arguments be introducing a constitutional amendment to prevent the federal government or the courts from attacking or striking down state marriage laws.
We should remain faithful to our moral heritage and never hesitate to defend it. It's unbefitting of Texans, and it's un-American. The government has no business asking pastors to turn over their sermons. These subpoenas are a grotesque abuse of power, and the officials who approved them should be held accountable by the people.
new comment 1
new comment 2