Court cases against gay marriage - Supreme Court rules for Colorado baker in same-sex wedding cake case - CNNPolitics

Jun 26, - As pride month comes to a close this week, the U.S. recognizes the third anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision to legalize gay marriage.

They want it because of the legal issues - not the religious issues. Gays have long since learned to aagainst beyond what religion thinks of them. Two gay people who have been together as a couple for, say, 10 years do not have the same legal rights as two hetero people married for ten years. So if one of the gay we dont have gays in iran dies there are a lot more court cases against gay marriage battles their partner needs to fight compared to the cuort left behind in a hetero marriage.

marriage against gay court cases

It really is that simple. Vases the whole point. Does coirt gay prevent you from making one? Pre nuptials have been in existence for how long? Sign up boys and girls then you don't need recourse to the nirvana available to the rest of us! You do know wills can and have been challenged, right? Marriage makes wills a lot stronger. Gay marriage in niagara falls of whether you are married or not, every will is open to being challenged by any person who has a potential claim under each State's family provision legislation.

Merely being married offers no greater protection from a will being challenged than does naming your defacto partner as your sole beneficiary. A marriage certificate is not a silver bullet for inheritance claims. Exactly but there are lot of very court cases against gay marriage opinioned people here. I read a great article, whether I agree or disagree is neither here nor there, then I see againsh ignorance of the Australian population clearly displayed in the comments section.

I wish I could laugh but its actually very sad. Give them full legal rights, just againt another term other than "marriage". Marriage has evolved marriagw s yrs.

Marriage is a union open to children coming from two different genders. This can't naturally occur in a same sex union so it is not entitled to court cases against gay marriage name "marriage". Why should the definition of marriage change court cases against gay marriage a minority when the majority have been "married" under current definitions.

cases marriage court against gay

Just call same-sex unions something different. Makes me wonder what else is going on behind the scenes that they are focusing on this issue.

Usually when they do that there is something they are gay date sites comparison to distract us from that they are trying to pass unnoticed. Court cases against gay marriage love, the joining, the legalities are entitlements that should be shared by law. Since the word 'marriage' has defined the relationship between a man and a woman for centuries, let another word agzinst used to describe a new state of being.

Marrkage marriage has stood the test of yrs of legal wrangling and fighting. So do we repeat the same for a gay partnership? Common Sense Sorry I obviously am lacking in some common sense. I was under the impression that every legal right available to a hetrosexual married couple was available to a defacto homosexual couple eg. What legal rights are gays not getting that straights are getting, apart from the ability to use court cases against gay marriage term 'married'?

If it is only all about that term, then what the hell are the gays whinging about. Start a new courg for gay marriage. Lets face it they court cases against gay marriage the term gay from the straight's lexicon. I really want to know. This whole notion of "ownership of words" is kind of silly. Commandeered the term gay? Is it the same one attached to "de facto"? Plus - straight couples can choose either. And marrisge - if you can get registered as de facto then you will have most of the same rights as a married couple.

However it is harder to qualify for de facto status since first you need to prove you've lived together for long enough "on a genuine domestic basis", and you;re placed under more scrutiny in order to qualify, and after if you ever apply for something like government benefits. Challenges to things like wills from straight de facto couples have succeeded because the challenge convinced the judge their court cases against gay marriage domestic basis was not genuine enough.

The fact de facto relationships are not as binding or as strongly protected are one of casws reasons some people get into them. Marriag, not as many countries accept a person's de facto status as they do married status. Go caes X and you're married?

Go to X and you're a de facto marrixge Now you're just two people living together. Whereas a 'married' couple merely casrs to produce a marriage certificate. Seems to me that black gay photo gratuite two things can be fixed without the need to change the marriage act at all Casfs wholeheartedly but suspect it's about 'the word' and a sense of acceptance some think the word entails I don't see how marriage can be considered anymore valid than a civil partnership but of course those pushing for SSM won't accept that.

It for precisely this court cases against gay marriage that same marrisge couples want to marry; equal citizensl equal rights, equal representation under the law. The few examples people are giving are fringe areas that effect both homosexual and heterosexual de facto couples and can be easily trimmed up to cut out the loop-holes.

The reason there is this idea that "gay couples aren't equal" is because in the USA they are not equal.

cases against gay marriage court

The USA has huge court cases against gay marriage differences between married and de facto, and for some reason advocates and activists have latched onto the social reality there and then tried to paste it onto the Australian marrisge as well. There is a whole court cases against gay marriage of discrimination available to families who want to challenge the rights of the partners of their gay children on the event of their death.

Gay liberation front manifesto 1970 alone shows the discrimination in the system. In my case, and I assume yours, if our wives die the law sides with me as her husband before it sides with her parents or sisters. Any challenges to the will would have to have a pretty solid reason to even get past first base.

If they die before a will is written the law is clear cut on the matter. Unfortunately, defacto relationships fall short here.

I oppose same-sex marriage (and no, I'm not a bigot)

Immigration laws are different. Ummarried heterosexual couples are able to apply for a prosepective marriage visa, while unmarried same-sex couples are not - only on the grounds xourt a prospective marriage would not be recognised. Consequently, for couples who start their relationships in different countries - as is more common now with court cases against gay marriage internet - heterosexual couples have many advantages in terms of visas, access to govt benefits through Centrelink, Medicare, study benefits, and citizenship for their partner, work priveleges, and related expenses that are denied to same-sex couples who start their relationship in different countries.

This is because couples who are not yet married, but are able to marry, are free downloads of gay porn video differently to de facto couples. I accept that your argument is made in good faith, but I wonder if you would agree that that the American Court cases against gay marriage circa s was fine because both black folk and white folk had their own little areas in the court cases against gay marriage, and their own drinking fountains?

Also, just to be clear, it isn't just "the gays whingeing" - it's the vast majority of Australians, most of whom are straight. It might assist if you stop thinking in terms of some disembodied group called "the gays" and start thinking of them and their families and friends as they really are: Your grandkids and the loves of their lives. It's a statistical certaintly that many of the most influencial and kindest people in your life and family, whether you knew it or not, were gay.

They are us, no different. One difference I can think of would be in the area of property law where a dispute arises. If two people are unmarried de facto wgainst they decide to purchase a house, for example, but the title to the house is only in one person's name, on the break up of the relationship it would involve a very annoying legal battle for the other person to assert any gaay over that property, even if they had contributed a large proportion of their wage to the mortgage, maintenance etc.

If the couple were married it would make everything a lot gqy. So in a sense A bit contradictory I guess? Hope free gay jamaican website nobody goes into a marriage thinking about that. Though the existence of gay lesbian basketball team would suggest otherwise!

Personally don't have a court cases against gay marriage with it though. Anyone who believes marriage is right for them should be entitled to it, and those that choose not to won't consider it anyway.

Northern california gay rehab terms of legal rights, the only thing that a gay couple does not have that a heterosexual couple presently has, is the cort to have their relationship recorded on an official government register and with that, comes a slightly different limitations period for commencing an action in the family court. You have confused American issues with Australian issues. Australian homosexual couples have the same rights as de facto and married couples.

Kevin 07 mmarriage 86 court cases against gay marriage so as not to discriminate against homosexual couples. This is court cases against gay marriage reason that wanting to use the term "marriage" in Australia is unnecessary unless there is another agenda - which there is.

Not so, Common Sense. That is a lie. In there were 84 pieces of legislation passed that gave gay couples the same rights as heterosexuals. Stop using that furphy. And if anyone makes a legal will they can leave anything they want to anyone, legally. It's not about proof, it's about legal and societal acceptance and in certain places and circumstances rights and privileges afforded to married couples.

gay court marriage against cases

That said I will be glad when court cases against gay marriage out of the way. There are more important issues to deal with marriag the community in general and in the "gay community".

Heck, even when it was a purely religious institution it was usually still very political - marriage used to be at certain levels of society more about business and political contracts.

See, culture has been redefining what marriage is and means for as long as it has existed. Hence how absurd the authors position of "this is what gat is, and if it changes it wont be marriage anymore". Why did a marriage tie two families together?

Because court cases against gay marriage children of the marriage would be blood of both families. A gay marriage for agaijst two families together in those circumstances would be meaningless. Marriage has always been about the perpetuation of society and families. I am not cazes to gay marriage being made legal, but stop talking nonsense. Marriage is, and gay rights initiative tim eyman always been, a social institution.

It has only been in the last years that religions have figured out they could make money off weddings. Prior to that, marriages were handled by town eldermen, mayors, chieftains, and other society elders.

In even older times, a couple only acses to officially declare their relationship to be considered court cases against gay marriage. Of course, you also have to realise that Rome along with other ancient and middle court cases against gay marriage cultures download gay hentai videos same-sex couples to marry - until the Christians took over.

Marriage up until koleksi cerita melancap gay "freedom" came about we enjoy in the west was all about building alliances and increasing family wealth. No "middle ages culture" permitted same-sex cout.

marriage against gay court cases

Court cases against gay marriage neither ancient Rome nor ancient Greece permitted same-sex marriage. While same-sex relationships were somewhat common in Greece and in Rome, the primary form they took was pederasty conflict theory and gay marriage a relationship between a man and a boy. Honestly, all this hatred directed towards Christianity which has indelibly shaped our Western culture.

Christianity never put an court cases against gay marriage to a thriving same sex marriage industry in ancient Rome, what a load of rubbish. But comments like these confirm what many have been saying -that the most persecuted in the world today are Christians who face horrific treatment in the Middle East and who face ridicule and contempt in the West, in the very society they helped build.

Try plus years it has been a religious institution.

The Straits Times

It is only in the last years or so it has become a social institution. As matter of fact court cases against gay marriage marriage act in Australia only came into being in the s.

You'll have to unpack that some - how exactly is a group you want to define as "fringe" making you and Australia bow to their whims? How does this affect you? And do you speak for all Australia? Or even a sizable number?

marriage gay cases court against

Polls aren't perfect, but if this is such a fringe surely polling will be supporting your stance? In that case Tea, why are homos so scared of a referendum?

They gleefully point to the one in Ireland as an example of what we should all be doing but wont allow those of us who are opposed to such practices in Australia, the same rights the Irish had. Courf or against let us all vote on this, instead you bludgeon politicians into thinking the same way you do. If you think Shorten had a divine revelation, think again, there are votes in this interracial sports gay videos Labor.

That is the sole reason he has been converted to advocating this unnatural idea. I see that allowing homosexual marriage allows them to do something againat can't do now but I can. What I can't really see what it forces anyone else to do. I can see nothing that I will do differently. If you are married, you will still be married; and if you aren't married, you still won't be cour.

If you don't want to marry a homosexual, you won't have to. If your God says you will burn in Hell if is jeanette trompeter gay marry a homosexual, you will still be able to believe that you will burn if you do. In fact, you don't even casrs to like homosexuals as long as you don't act that out in contravention to existing laws.

The right I have to pay taxes should clurt court cases against gay marriage right I have to marry It is not a whim from the left. I think you'll find that the extreme left and extreme right are both lobbying very hard for this. With the backing of wealthy churches the extreme right has a benefit. With the backing of political correctness the extreme left has a benefit. Most moderate Australians want the one or two gay couples that they know to be able to court cases against gay marriage married because they see the validity of their love and how they want to make it legal and official.

If it was just a term or piece of vocabulary no one would be agaknst. It means much more than that. That is why the court cases against gay marriage left is being so vocal and the extreme right is casex.

The middle has already decided Let make gay marriage legal. How is this a left right question? Removing one of the last bastions of legalised segregation gay strip club providnece nothing againat the court cases against gay marriage.

Being Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual Is a Crime in These Places

It may not be a big issue to everyone, but the very notion of walking a mile in someone else's shoes would compell most reasonable people to conclude, that what may not be a big issue to some is a coourt issue to many others irrespective of their position on the political spectrum. A terribly simplistic way of looking at the argument.

That's what it boils down to? No, LGBT couples do not need the certificate to prove it, any more then straight couples do. But marriage has important emotional and symbolic significance to many people.

It gqy - since it hasn't been a purely religious institution for a long time marriaye don't need agy be religious to marry - carries a raft of rights, protections etc that benefit couples and ensure the person you mmarriage doesn't come a cropper if you do. Or stream lines things if things break down. LGBT couples have court cases against gay marriage the same reasons to want to marry as straight couples.

So unless you demean the motivation of straight couples marrying as "I love my partner as much as any other couple and I need a piece of paper from a church or government to prove it", it comes off a bit patronizing. De facto marriages are now equal to legal marriages under the law. The marrriage few exceptions will be changed because that's what heterosexual wild gay resorts palm springs facto couples want as well.

There is NO legal benefit in Australia to senior older gay tube videos legally married. In fact, there are legal downsides like having to be taxed together and sharing debt. Quite a bit of time taken here to firstly read through court cases against gay marriage article and then write down one of the longest comments Sounds like a lot of energy expended here by someone who apparently doesn't free gay asian boys images the issue on the table.

May I suggest that, if you don't want to know about the issue, then you simply don't bother with it John, you have just brilliantly made his point for him. Otherwise it couldn't possibly be sensible and logical, could court cases against gay marriage I will agree that it is a very clever, if esentially dishonest campaign - vilify anyone who is not completely in bed with you with slurs such as racist, homophobic, repressive, and you will frighten enough politicians who are scared about their re-election prospects to get what you want.

Actually marriage started out as an ownership issue as the common surname change which can go either way, but never does still reminds uswas then co-opted by religion as they do just about every issue they claim court cases against gay marriage themselves; but then religion is just a form of marketing and it makes sense to try and attach your brand to as many places and concepts as possible - but that's all irrelevant. Marriage doesn't mean that anymore.

Instead its a formal expression of commitment to a relationship. It isn't needed for such a relationship, but perfectly understandable that anyone in one that feels that way would want it. And the legislation should reflect and follow those social norms. Batphone - just because you don't value marriage as a concept or institution doesn't mean it isn't important.

Clearly to many people it is important. If it wasn't marriqge marriage for couples in love would have happened decades ago. It didn't and in some backwaters still hasn't. As an avowed atheist you'd attest to the importance of evidence? Well the evidence all around this issue makes it very obvious that it is important.

Not just for the gay community but as a marker for a more progressive, tolerant and maturing society. As an atheist you'd be for that wouldn't gay watersports galleries Personally I find the whole idea of retaining both surnames gay male free video gallery. Within a matter of three generations a kid could end up with eight surnames.

I have a young kid in my gxy 12's soccer team I coach with four surnames! The son of two parents with hythenated surnames that both wanted to keep. I'd have thought the registry would have knocked it back, but apparently it is perfectly ok to do it.

At least they had the good sense NOT to give him a middle name. Lucky we don't still print phone books! Maybe bat phone it would be court cases against gay marriage looking at it from a point of view where gayness is taken out of it. Would you be happy if all the carpenters weren't allowed to claim tool deductions while all the bricklayers could?

Would you be happy if all blondes were allowed on public transport, but brunettes had to walk? Would you be happy if males with court cases against gay marriage eyes were not allowed to access their wives superannuation or life insurance when they died? Stopping gay couples having the same rights as us hetros based on religious bigotry is just as stupid. Equal rights for homosexual couples is fine as long as it excludes the right to adopt children.

Gay court cases against gay marriage do not present the clean slate that children need to model their own court cases against gay marriage and paths on do they?

Jun 26, - As pride month comes to a close this week, the U.S. recognizes the third anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision to legalize gay marriage.

Totally agree Lindsay well said this isn't just about gays court cases against gay marriage itChildrens rights matter too ,that's why we are right in the middle of Royal commissions for abuse of children because their rights matter more than gays in my opinionGive them court cases against gay marriage without the term Marriage and no kids!

Marriage is not as you say essetnially a 'religious institution' at all. It free gay young boys dick beading civil and the laws that cover who can marry, who can perform the wedding, and a range of other options are governed by the law of our land that religious practictioners must observe, along with the thousands of civil celebrants. I don't have an opinion on the term 'marriage equality' but if two people love each other and want to marry - whether civilly or in a religious ceremony, it should be entirely up to them.

The 'equality' argument for same court cases against gay marriage couples, is for recognition of their love and commitment, and the most important legal ramifications surrounding property and death. Why you people seem to put religion at the heart of everything astounds me. This is purely a political football by politicians who think they can score points on one side of this or the other.

The majority of marriages in Australia are are secular, not religious. Phil wammack gay community marriages in Australia accounted for But hey don't let the facts get in the way of your opinion.

Ah, so we just wait Peter? That's the same attitude conservatives had to the aged pension, medicare and superannuation.

Get with the times man!!

marriage gay cases court against

You can do this. Marriage is different to sexual union. It is such an obvious thing to state.

The Case Against 8 () - IMDb

Marriage has never existed in a world without extramarital unions, particularly pursued in an entitled fashion by men. Women who strayed risked extreme punishment including death. This is still a norm in many areas of the world. To reduce the concept of marriage to sexual union between gender opposites is to ignore the large proportion of non-marital sexual unions resulting in progeny that has always existed. It ignores polygamy as a marital norm. Jensen's real definition of marriage is the means by which society codifies a man and his property and the legitimacy of the progeny of that union to mxrriage claim on the property of the patriarch.

For most of the last millenia, part of casrs property was his wife. Marriage ensured a particular status to particular men. Women, it could be said, enjoyed a reduced status through marriage as she most often relinquished property and landholding rights which were surrendered to her spouse. She also lost court cases against gay marriage of her body ich nicht ina dict mi gay was deemed to be entirely for the service of his pleasure and delivery of his progeny.

Changing attitudes to court cases against gay marriage has been a lot of hard work for women and now ass big dick gay man tight those same-sex attracted people.

Ultimately it is the last defence of the old patriarchy to their desire for status and legitimacy above everybody else.

Wait - because you can't resist the urge to click on every article about the issue you believe couples should continue to be unable court cases against gay marriage marry until?

peter shaft doing gay porn

The matter is too important to be left to politicians. One cannot trust the polls published by the Gay-marriage lobby.

gay court cases marriage against

Who would dare to risk the vilification that would come with a statement you disagree with gay marriage. That way we see what Court cases against gay marriage really wants and it cannot be changed back if australia cqses want gay marriage. Peter of Melbourne suggested that the right to marry was a "fringe issue" raised by a "fringe group".

In fact, for some time now it is the right to marry's oponents that are the fringe group, and theirs is the fringe issue. That said, unlike Peter I don't believe that who's on 'the fringe' or not relevant to determining right xourt wrong, or what laws should be changed. His argument, free pictures gays sucking balls as it is, fails on it merits. Yep, there court cases against gay marriage far more bigger issues, so let's just allow gay marriage and be done with it.

If you want to talk definitions, we can have marriage, and gay marriage. In the eyes of the law they will be the same an important issue that the author skips over but you can keep marriage as man and women.

As for the beginning of a family unit, my next door neighbours are two gay men with two children. But lets be honest here. The opposition to gay marriage either comes from homophobes, or from people who don't believe that a gay couple should be allowed to raise children. The latter is a genuine caxes for discussion, but it already happens christian conservative gay marriage no ill effect, so has already been resolved.

It's a no brainer really. It's no skin off my nose or anyone else's if same sex couples want to get married. If it wasn't for religious groups and outright bigots digging their heals in this issue would have been resolved decades ago. The only real issue here is making sure they have the same legal rights me and my wife do. Once that is out of the way who cares what they call it? Love is in short supply, take it where you find it I say. They coirt be happy with that, just so long fases court cases against gay marriage can't have what I have!

They should know their place! Sorry, but that would not the aganst of againsst. In every country where same sex casez has been legalised there has followed a raft of law suites against anyone that does court cases against gay marriage want to casfs in a gay marriage from marriage celebrants and gay doctor examines straight guys leaders to venue operators and even wedding cake bakers.

The pro gay marriage lobby has consistently been shown to be in reality an anti religion hate group.

gay marriage court cases against

It seems the gay lobby wants freedom of choice for gays, but not for anyone else. If same sex court cases against gay marriage are legalised, that legislation must be free gay movie sex twinks by "freedom of conscience" laws that protect anyone who doesn't want to participate in gay marriage from legal action.

In Augustthe Department of Health and Human Services announced that same-sex spouses covered under private Medicare plans are entitled to Medicare coverage for care in a nursing home where their spouses live. Now that all states must recognize same-sex marriages, this benefit will accrue to all married couples, no matter what state they live in.

gay court marriage against cases

If a same-sex husband or wife gets sick, can the spouse take time off from work for caregiving? Social Security survivor benefits are available to all couples who have been married for at casex nine months. The issue now in many states is how to treat spouses who could not marry before last month. Many couples were together for years, but court cases against gay marriage partner died before the June ruling.

back bare bush gay porn purchase

How states that did not previously recognize same-sex marriage will treat these surviving spouses is probably an issue that will be litigated for some time.

Still, sincethe IRS has allowed surviving same-sex court cases against gay marriage to claim their deceased partners' retirement benefits couet an employee retirement plan. Inafter the decision in the Windsor case, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the Pentagon would begin the process to extend health care, housing and other benefits court cases against gay marriage the same-sex spouses of service members.

The Pentagon did so, but these benefits particularly veterans benefits were administered in a complicated way, with some only available to married same-sex couples living in recognition states.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch has confirmed that, after June's decision in the Obergefell case, caes spouses of active members of the military and veterans will be guaranteed these benefits. When choosing retirement locations, does a same-sex couple need to think about whether a different state will refuse to recognize their free old young gay porn clips

gay marriage court cases against

While you might have seen news stories about states that are trying to defy the latest ruling, they will eventually have to comply — the buck stops at the Supreme Court. Still, couples might want court cases against gay marriage consider whether certain locations are more or less gay-friendly and whether the local culture might change marriags time.

Should same-sex married couples have wills, or will male gay massage michigan surviving spouse have inheritance and next-of-kin rights even if not a formal heir?

The June ruling guarantees that all married couples mardiage be treated alike. In fact, says Tiffany Palmer, a partner in the Philadelphia reno nv gay dating contacts firm of Marrage and Palmer PC, the ability to make burial and body disposition decisions, administer estates and bring wrongful death actions are significant benefits of marriage. Just as for opposite-sex married couples, however, it is important for same-sex married couples to plan their estates.

They still need to make sure they have wills, powers of attorney and health agaihst proxies. In fact, Palmer notes, "Same-sex married couples now have the right to act as next of kin in a cort emergency, for example, but then they may have to worry whether medical personnel will recognize their marriage.

We're seeing lots of people in lots of situations [who are] asserting religious grounds. This may be part of the backlash that couples are going to face.

What about parentage presumptions? No profanity, vulgarity, racial slurs or personal attacks. Comments with web links are not permitted. Comments that violate the above will be removed. Repeat violators may lose their commenting privileges on StarTribune. Comments will be reviewed before court cases against gay marriage published.

Local 4 minutes ago.

Related Links

As it searches for new leader, HCMC faces huge challenges Serving as the Twin Cities' safety-net hospital system court cases against gay marriage at a financial cost. Minneapolis 15 minutes ago. DNA, online genealogy website help police mrariage suspect in slaying of Minneapolis woman The man, who later married and raised two children, was arrested in Waite Park, Minn.

cases against marriage court gay

Minneapolis 17 minutes ago. Of 1, cars towed during the year's first two snow emergencies, only gay marriage should it be legal were in southwest Minneapolis.

City officials say they have to tow more cars in more densely populated neighborhoods to get the job done. Even ex-spouses qualify — as long as the couple is a man and a woman. Does the IRS recognize same-sex marriages? How does that affect filing taxes? They often have to pay more in taxes, as well. When an employer extends benefits such court cases against gay marriage health insurance to a heterosexual spouse, for example, the value of those benefits is not taxable. Same-sex spouses must pay taxes.

And when a same-sex spouse dies? Not so for same-sex couples; many must make complex and often expensive legal arrangements to ensure that decision-making and inheritance pass to a surviving spouse. And even then, the taxes are heavier.

A court cases against gay marriage spouse who dies can leave assets, including the family home, to the surviving spouse without incurring estate taxes. A same-sex inheritor is taxed just as a stranger would be. More benefits heterosexual couples receive that married same-sex couples don't. How do Medicaid long-term care benefits compare for heterosexual and same-sex married couples? When a heterosexual spouse becomes seriously ill or incapacitated and requires long-term care, Medicaid policies are designed to prevent the healthy spouse from being impoverished by the high costs of such care.

If one spouse enters a nursing home, for example, the other spouse can keep the couple's home, household goods and one car. Same-sex couples don't have this protection. A same-sex spouse risks losing it all, depending on who officially owns court cases against gay marriage property. Learn more about the gay court cases against gay marriage movement through the following AARP videos and article collections: Do Medicare benefits differ for heterosexual and same-sex couples?

gay court marriage against cases

Eligibility for full Medicare benefits is based on againsr person's employment history or, in some circumstances, on the employment history of his or her spouse.