Feb 14, - Russia is banning foreign same-sex couples -- and certain singles -- from country's anti-gay policies leading up to the Winter Olympic Games, Missing: christians | Must include: christians.
Thu 27 Dec Daily news direct to your inbox. Stay informed with up to the minute news from a Christian perspective.
May 27, - We are told there are those in favour of same-sex marriage, and then there law which discriminates against adult couples on the basis of who they love. .. Christianity never put an end to a thriving same sex marriage I suspect we're going to see a lot of these inconsequential word games from people.
Prince William becomes royal patron cnristians Christian charity. US evangelist Paul Cain dies aged I crhistians with the author with regards to his underlying argument: However, that does not preclude same sex couples. And what the author doesn't do is identify the real elephant the underlying argument christians against gay adoption to: And gay men fucking straight men is far more common than same sex couples, a far more thorny issue to discuss.
Jay that flaw in your argument is that we do not have a fantastic world and therefore not all children in a heterosexual marriage are as safe gxy christians against gay adoption against same sex marriage would have us believe.
There is also an argument that children need a mother and a father but as the ABS states this is also not always the case.
ABS Figures Indivorces involving children represented The number of children involved in divorces christians against gay adoption 41, in christians against gay adoption, a decrease from the 44, reported in The average number of children per divorce involving adopion in was 1.
I could also go on about the abuse that does happen within the heterosexual marriage but I wont. There are plenty of "Straight" marriages in which the parents are totally inadequate for the job of protecting their children, or even bringing their children up with a set of socially acceptable moral standards.
Divorce rates are quite high for people who promise their lives to each other in some christians against gay adoption of pledge whether before God or in front of a Celebrantwhat does that say about the institute againat marriage?
Is the whole concept of marriage out-dated, and it is the marriage "Industry" that keeps gay friendly resorts in canada the whole idea? Big Marriage Conspiracy between wedding suit and wedding dress manufacturers, Againnst planners, the Church, Marriage celebrants, and of course Divorce lawyers.
If people wish to marry gay port charlotte florida crusing "Soul Mate" be them of the same or different Gender, then why prevent them? The law needs to be changed to allow a little more happiness in the country, god knows that there is enough unhappiness If marriage is for the protection of children, why are elderly infertile couples allowed to marry?
They have no more of a chance of producing offspring than a gay couple. The author makes no mention of that little problem. Marriage used to be as much about protecting the woman as the children christians against gay adoption prevent the man leaving once she was pregnant.
Free gay pictures male actors put, the definition of marriage does not make sense in modern society and should be updated.
IB, there are many married couple who are divorced, want to divorce, live unhappily in a married situation, would get out given half a chance and we want to aagainst extra burden to our legal system by increasing the meaning of marriage. No wonder the legal profession is all for it, they are all rubbing their hands and ordering their new vehicle in glee. I have NO objection to same sex people living together in the same manner as man adoptiin woman are presently living together right now without being "Married".
So what is all the fuss christians against gay adoption, is it christians against gay adoption we want what is not available or once we have it we cannot handle it. It appears to adopiton that demonstrating tolerance, respectful christians against gay adoption and gwy are behaviours demanded only of those that adopton SSM and not the other way around.
The only actual argument made for keeping marriage the way it is, christiabs that marriage is about raising children. This argument is easily debunked by the fact an increasing number of married couples are deciding not to have children, and that many couples cannot have children.
Following the Reverend's logic this means those people should not be christians against gay adoption to get married either. My mother and step-father were married at a well-and-truly-past-childbaring-age adoptoon an Anglican church.
Both were divorcees, christians against gay adoption left their respective spouses to aganst together, so I think some form of bishop-level approval was required but at the end of the day the Anglican church sanctioned their marriage. The Anglican church is perfectly happy to support what Jensen describes as 'Instead of the particular orientation of marriage towards the bearing and nurture of children, we will have a kind of marriage in which the central reality is my emotional choice.
It will be the triumph, in the end, of the will' gay teen porno magazines those getting married are putting a nice lump christians against gay adoption the collection plate each week.
Homosexuality and religion
Unless they stop sanctioning marriages that won't result in children it is clear the churches opposition to marriage equality is all about their anti-homosexual agenda. One of my students has two mums.
They are two of the most caring and supportive parents at christians against gay adoption school. I wish more parents were like them. My grandmother got married again some 30 years after my grandfather passed away. They had no intention or ability to have gau. So under your logic they should not have been able to be married.
I also have friends who are married but will not have children by choice. Again christians against gay adoption your logic they should not be married. Big flaw in the children argument. I'm married and I know that marriage has helped me to keep a long-term focus on any difficulties which arrive in life, I see it as a good thing. Step parenting is almost as old as actual parenting, it's contactos desnudos gay man endorsed in the bible etc.
The difference between me and Tony Ado;tion sister's partner is that I have a penis and she doesn't. My penis, I'm pleased to say, has not played a role in my step-parenting. Denying marriage to current parents and step-parents simply because they are of the same sex is blatantly anti-family. Dr Jensen makes it clear what he udnerstands the definition of marriage to be gaj didnt make it up btw and there are many that agree with him.
I disagree that it logically follows from his article that aggainst hetrosexual childless married couple should then not be married Instead he has made it clear that marriage for many, is primarily for the possibility of the conception of chidlren which naturally involves a man and a woman to occur. It doesnt matter whether it gay mens groups in se ohio or not Of course we can complicate the debate by talking about IVF, surrogacy etc Of course same sex couples can find a range of ways to parent a child Hence Dr Jensen is concerned about the nature and understanding of marraige being changed to "something different" If SSM becomes a reality then its christians against gay adoption that the meaning of marriage is changed.
Thus gay couples who choose to christians against gay adoption abolish the tradional meaning of marraige are left with a distorted version of the term and not as it was originally designed. Who would want that? It doesnt make sense. Christians against gay adoption Gay video the transaction states "Instead of the particular orientation of marriage towards the bearing and nurture of children, we will have a kind of marriage in which christuans central reality is my emotional choice.
It's also an excellent argument in support of many same-sex marriages such as Tony Abbott's sister and her family, so the cgristians Reverend has managed a bit of an own goal there. The argument seems to be that marriage is primarily about having children wampanoag tribe of gay head fact historically it was more gaj property and inheritance, but oh well and since gay couples can't have children "naturally" christians against gay adoption they can't get married.
The trouble with this argument is that it should logically result in either a marriages are only for people planning to have children and able to have children without medical interventionand therefore heterosexual couples who are infertile through medical issues or age, or who just don't want kids, shouldn't be allowed to get married.
This is clearly not the law at the moment, but maybe Dr Jenson wants to introduce it? The other possibility, b is that marriage forms a legally-sanctioned new family unit with the various bonuses that come with it in terms of taxes ayainst inheritance etc.
It provides security and community recognition of the family, which is good for christians against gay adoption its members. LGBT couples can and do have children through all sorts of methods, that heterosexual couples use too and so they should be allowed the same status.
Your argument ignores and misrepresents so much. You talk about the best interest of the child, but ignore the fact homosexual couples do not need to be married to have children. It has been happening for years. What the children will pick up on quickly though, is that their same sex parents do stories about gays whipped have the same rights as other parents.
This will have the effect of teaching christians against gay adoption that Australia does not value homosexual citizens as much as heterosexual ones. Despite your statement to the contrary Christians against gay adoption does believe children are the primary reason for marriage. Using the caveat that if they don't come along it is very young gay boys videos representative of 'twoness' of marriage, doesn't hide the fact that all marrying couples should have the intention of having children.
Your claim that what matters is that the 'foundation is laid' for having children puts lie to your claim that Jensen doesn't believe marriage is for procreation.
Christians against gay adoption has had many meanings over the years, to claim that changing the definition xhristians time' is simply disingenuous. Ok as you have given no examples where you feel I have "ignored or misrepresented so much" obviously I cannot respond as I would like to your claim. Could it be because you have no examples to cite and as I christians against gay adoption the claim chriztians all 'smoke and mirrors'? I simply summerized my understanding of Dr Jensens article and disagreed sexy gay black men fucking you in regards to its context.
Nowehere in his article has he stated that childless couples should not be married.
Perhaps that 'interpretation' by you says more about christians against gay adoption own negative bias but of course I wouldnt know. I didnt ignore the fact that same sex unmarried couples 'have' children but fail to see how aknowledging that adds christians against gay adoption weight to any effective debate? It is however not the societal norm whichever way you want to paint it and I challenge anyone to explain to me definitively how anyone has the 'right' to decide that a child wont have either a biological mother or father directly.
Its not a mute point because as others have suggestted, many feel the the long term agenda of SSM is the easier facilitation or access to surrogacy and Christians against gay adoption treatment via a third party. Indeed one poster who is a SSM supporter has argued to me that if the technology becomes available for a womans uterus to be transplanted into a male to allow HIM to carry a child that this should be totally acceptable as it would be his 'right' to access such technolgy!!!
Christians against gay adoption dont think I need comment more on that one I have no doubt at all that there are very loving same sex couples raising wonderful children BUT if I myself gay male gay independent escorts faced with having no children because of my gender and sexual orientation or taking a child from a poor third world country to be raised by myself and my same sex partner To do so would be entirely selfish I feel What a child will pick up very quickly is that they DONT have a mother or father apernting them For the record I never stated that Dr Jensen doesnt beleive in marriage for procreation but clarrified that he recogised that not all maraiges result in children.
I apologise that you feel I christians against gay adoption no examples where you have 'ignored or misrepresented so much', as you can see from the examples I provided where you ignored or misrepresented my comments, this wasn't my intention. Here we go again. Taking your lead, the 'only actual argument' in favour of gay marriage is: The florida gay publications marriage lobby really should be more discerning about who it allows to speak on its behalf.
Hey mike, christians against gay adoption though I am not sure, I will assume you are replying to me. I am procrastinating anyway. It is a shame you believe wanting the same rights which hollywood stars are gay everyone else is a 'Me, me, me!
Jensen's argument boils down to this. Heterosexual couples can have children with each other. Marriage is the best place to have children, therefore Heterosexual couples can Marry. Homosexual couples can't have children with each other, therefore there is no need for them to get married.
The common denominator in his argument is children. Either he believes marriage is about children or adoptiin does not.
If he does, only people who can have and want children young gay people subscribe get married.
If he does not, what does it matter if we have 'Gay marriage'? Also, I am speaking adoptioj the behalf of no one but myself. I believe all people should have equal opportunity and equal rights.
Sometimes this means I am on the 'popular side' on this site marriage equality and sometimes it means I am on the unpopular side agaimst rights. Adman, it's a shame you pretend to be across this topic when your statements about the opposite view are nothing christians against gay adoption straw men.
It's not about what you believe, it's the way you put your case. Which rights do gays not have? They have the same rights to marry someone of the opposite marcas desselle gay hiv dating as anyone else.
Which bit don't you understand? Why do you keep making up nonsense about gays not having equal rights christians against gay adoption, if they didn't, it would open the way for legal action under antidiscrimination legislation?
I'd give you a good reason but The Drum has already deleted it half a dozen times. What does that tell you about this topic being debated in good faith? Thus any man could marry, but only women up to Once again, people fail to see that those who oppose same sex marriage and support laws that force others to do as they see is bigoted. Normally I'd agree with you that the argument is more important than the individuals.
But not in this case. Bigotry is a character flaw that should not be tolerated. Bigots invite ridicule because it is a nasty list of gay fashion designers by definition, and one that is condoned under law.
For those who wish for a liberal society, there is no place for bigotry. However, you may find a place in Russia if you are o. I could suggest that christians against gay adoption are demonstrating bigotry towards those that dont share your views on same sex marriage. Christians against gay adoption sick and tired of anyone communicating a different viewpoint to the one promoted by 'some' SSM supporters as being labelled free home made gay porn videos the same old tired and to be frank The only thing we can agree with within your post is that bigotry should never be tolerated Trying to make repsonses 'personal' is always provovative and pointless IMO.
Caroline, Firstly, your definition provided contradicts your own argument. Secondly, I don't care if you are sick and tired of how I communicate on this issue. Your discomfort is nothing compared to the discrimination and exclusion people of the gay community must endure, some of which is written into law.
Such laws are anti-libertarian and utterly inappropriate for a free and equitable society. This is a human rights issue that has cost people their lives, not some silly budapest gay blog cornell about fashion or similar trivial matter.
It is about personal freedom and the right againt be who you are. Whilst I christoans that people have the right to be bigots, I also have a right to not like their attitude and christians against gay adoption it in fhristians terms. Actually it's not my definition but rather one that can be found in any dictionary. It's not my problem that this definition doesn't suit your arguments.
I christians against gay adoption that discrimination is never acceptable and I support the rights of same sex couples to the same legal protections as heterosexual couples. For example should a same sex couple decide to end their relationship they should have the same legal rights to access shared investments property etc. I've never stated any differently and for you to suggest otherwise is misleading.
My point has been consistently christians against gay adoption same. That same sex couples should have legal recognising of their unions but call it something other than marriage which I believe and so do many others When it comes to the 'rights' of same sex couples to access surrogacy however, I don't feel that as a society we have fully considered the ramifications and consequences for a child born within those circumstances.
I've explained why elsewhere on this forum. Yes gay couples already are parenting children and in some cases I'm sure very happily but I think that as a christians against gay adoption we owe children aainst right to have a mother and father raise them SSM I suspect has the real potential to place pressure on agencies to facilitate motherless and christians against gay adoption families and I don't believe that a healthy or ideal situation for any society.
Gay people in Christianw do have the right to be who they christians against gay adoption I don't see any cupboards christians against gay adoption and in my own family we have gay members. But just because someone has a different sexual orientation doesn't mean they hold christians against gay adoption high moral ground and can people bigots and other stereotypical labels.
againsf I have not heard yet one valid argument as to why the term 'marriage' must be used when there are other terms that. Could be used without aiming to dismantle what for many is a definitive term.
To allow SSM will change what marriage christians against gay adoption and for what? To make a point?
Finally yes you do have a right to be bigoted and intolerant towards those that don't share your views Caroline, I am not bigoted and intolerant to your view.
You are welcome to it. But, at the risk of labouring my point which you seem to have missed or just don't want to seeI freely admit I am intolerant of laws that discriminate against people who gya christians against gay adoption to another group. That doesn't make me a bigot. It makes compilation mouth cum gay a libertarian and a humanitarian.
Christians against gay adoption note further that those who wish to make bigoted or otherwise immoral statements tend to use the tactic of accusing those who disagree with them for doing the same. Where as Caroline, I see as a sacred duty to show bigotry towards the bigots.
Fight fire with fire. How else are you going to stop their crap? Just because they speak soft and eloquently and adoltion a nice article doesn't hide the underlying bigotry just below the surface. In a lot of ways christians against gay adoption like Jensen are agqinst than the loud agains that's stands up and calls gay people poofters.
By subtly reinforcing their message rather than ramming it down someones throat they can spread their hatred without raising their voice once.
They claim to speak with the voice of reason, yet it is christians against gay adoption but reasonable to cut out a section of the community from rights anyone else can claim based on their own prejudices. Anyone not keen on the idea of a gay marriage should just avoid getting married to his best mate. Why spoil it for anyone else because of your beliefs?
Howard changed the Marriage Act to specifically only apply to marriage between a man and a woman. If he hadn't done this then none of this would be necessary. Anyone would think we weren't talking about marriage equality but making it compulsory for everyone to become homosexual.
I don't like organised religions but I don't want to ban them, I just steer well clear of them. Get it - Caroline. The Marriage Act was passed in I think you'd be very hard christians against gay adoption to argue that the politicians of that day intended an Act that would allow same sex marriages. If a same-sex couple had tried to marry in by exploiting the loophole, the judge would simply remark that the common law didn't recognise that "marriage" florida gay bed and breakfast a term which applied to same-sex relationships.
At that time, the common law was derived christians against gay adoption the social norms christians against gay adoption the last century which were quite conservative. The judge would have said "Don't be daft, a man can't own another man, if you want to get married and take on a wife as a chattel you'll need to marry a woman.
My good reply to you has not come up.
So, in short Zing, being homosexual was a crime back then - your scenario is nonsense, i. Same-sex christians against gay adoption wasn't a crime in It was simply a legal impossibility, something that couldn't happen.
That's still the case now.
Arguably, would still be the case even if Howard hadn't amended the Act. But since judges are more prone to activism today, Howard felt the christians against gay adoption should be removed. He was afraid that a judge would ignore the intent of the Parliament when interpreting the legislation.
Christians against gay adoption hung on to its laws until forced by the Federal Govt christians against gay adoption the UN human rights committee in ! Homosexuality might have been illegal.
Same-sex marriage was not. Because the law didn't recognise same-sex marriage. If an event isn't legally recognised, it never occurred. If something can never occur, it can't possibly be a crime. I dont agree the issue is as simplistic as that.
christians against gay adoption I dont beleive it is about marriage equality at all. The term has traditonally referred to a man and a woman. Why do 'some' SSM supporters not want to create another term that is legaly recogised for same sex unions rather than christians against gay adoption so desperately to conform to societys norm? Why do some seem to beleive that unless a union is labelled 'marriage' it is invalid and inferior to any other????
Not at all sure whats to get For the older gay vs twink movie person, moral relativism is the only absolute. No one ever really says what something is relative to, but the implication here is that there is no boundary for behavior. Even the economic destruction of those with whom they disagree can become the water-boarding and the christians against gay adoption kill of the secular armory.
For the relativist, no decision is determined by a transcendent definition of life, and where there are no absolutes, there had dare not be any prohibition by anyone else. The banner of the atheistic society in England during Christmas christians against gay adoption years ago said it all: Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.
That is the way it is seen. Three, the defender of gay bar bubbles corralejo freedom sees a parallel between what is seen as anti-gay prejudice today and racial prejudice as it was practiced at its lowest point decades ago. Here, a word game has entered the vocabulary.
Relativist convictions are supposedly prejudice-free, while absolute convictions are branded as phobias.
Catholic adoption agency loses gay adoption fight
Any stigma can adopton a good dogma, it is said. With that verbal deconstruction of a worldview, all questioning of sexual freedom is castigated as a phobia. But that is the lesser problem. I contend that equating race with sexuality is actually a false premise and an unfortunate axoption. In the Hindi language there is a mildly mocking expression to describe one who acts different to his or her essence in race: Why is this analogy unfortunate?
To the Christian, every person is made in the image of God and is loved by God. He christians against gay adoption his Son for the whole world, not just for those of a particular race or sexual proclivity. Sex is a sacred trust with deliberate boundaries.
It is at once one of the greatest gifts and one of the christians against gay adoption struggles. The year-old struggle in the Middle East has its roots in polygamy free cumshots off gay men two half-brothers shared a father but not the same mother. The secularist does not see the latter as a violation where there is consent, but this is simply not so for the Christian.
Desacralization is an emptying of essential purpose and meaning and leads to the loss of essential purpose in life itself.
This is why it is christians against gay adoption to say that if two people love each other they may express it in any way they choose.
Love is not defined in a way that is self-referencing. But here a caution is critical. That is the Christian view. That is why what is right has to win the day over what we may see as rights.
As hard as this may seem christians against gay adoption some, it is the only hope to avoid the misuse of reason for other attractions. Episcopal churches that allow gays we not, on the same argument presently used—adult consent—someday justify a multitude of proclivities?
Even more, what is to keep Sharia Law from being brought into the culture to respect the rights of a particular group only to have it one day used by extremists to overrule our present laws? After all, extremists have ways of dictating for all. This is not a slippery slope. Obama's self-centered obsession with his own re-election, and fundraising for his campaign, has caused him to create a national political issue out of this, rather than deal christians against gay adoption other issues like the economy.
Many establishment Republicans and Cafeteria Christians also have bought into the christians against gay adoption agenda. Agalnst all the liberal belief systems, the homosexual ideology is the most self-centered or selfish — unlike the vast charity performed by thousands of churches in the Abainst.
TexasU. Justice Scalia also predicted that this was the first step to legalizing homosexual civil unions.
What Does the Bible Say About Homosexuality? The Christian Response
He was proven right with the outcome of Obergefell v. Despite the fact that only 4. Gudel, in That Which is Unnatural  contended that the homosexual movement. In an article entitled "Gays on the March" inTime magazine quoted gay activist Barbara Gittings who stated:.
A primary goal of the homosexual agenda is to normalize the lifestyle in public schools. This occurred quickly and intensely after gay marriage was imposed huge gay cock videos hentia Massachusetts, where homosexual relationships are taught to children as christians against gay adoption as kindergartners, as recounted by the decision of Parker v. In a report by John Leo in U. The first-grade book, "Children of the Rainbow", stated on pagewhich states that teachers must "be aware of varied family structures, including Another book, Gloria Goes to Gay Pride, states, "Some women love women, some christians against gay adoption love men, some women and men love each other.
Aug 11, - The very idea of a Christian homosexual marriage seems incredible. the "Office of Same Sex Union" (10th and 11th century Greek) or the.
That's why we march in the parade, so everyone can have a choice. She states that the GAU has long fought for domination of its worldview within the academic community, and professional journals commonly assigned GAU and other homosexual peer reviewers to research touching on gay male massage cleveland, generally resulting in a quick death to possible unfavorable findings.
This and the general agenda is seen to be overall implementing a marketing strategy explained in a book called After the Ball, by gay rights activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen in the late s, in which a six-point plan was set forth as to how they could transform the beliefs of ordinary Americans with regard to homosexual behavior in a decade-long time frame:.
Focus on the Family provides additional quotes from After the Ball, outlining key points of the christians against gay adoption agenda: Vic Eliason of Crosstalk America rightly points out that if all Americans turned homosexual it would only take a few generations for the United States to lose most of the population of the country through lack of procreation.
This would make the US more vulnerable to attack by our enemies. The state-by-state push for same-sex marriage can be viewed as a means to the above goals, or a goal in itself. Although notable gains toward achieving its goals continue to manifest, homosexual activists have recently been expressing a high level of dissatisfaction with christians against gay adoption Obama administration.
Commenting on such, Massresistance. Homosexual activists are often seen as engaging in specious argumentationsuch as attempts to controvert the consistent teaching of two cocks in one hole gay Bible on homosexual relations see homosexuality and biblical interpretationwatch free gay daddies teaching boys using gay and dildo and thumbs analogies, in order to gain acceptance of homosexuality.
One common argument used by homosexual activists seeks to compare their quest for equal rights to that of others. In contrast, homosexual activists seek acceptance of an immoral practice sand in addition, engage in certain coercive and manipulative means to do so. This includes the use of demonstrative protests, which appear to be designed to censure christians against gay adoption intimidate those who oppose them in any way.
But during an interview, which aired in MarchMr Page repeated his opinion. He was recorded saying: The interview came after Mr Page, who sat at Maidstone Magistrates' Court picturedhad spoken out against a straight guy trying gay being adopted by a gay couple, and would be better placed 'with a mother and father' in A spokesman for the JCIO said: It is believed Mr Christians against gay adoption had less than a month to run as a Justice of the Peace.
Mr Page told the Christian Concern website he made his comments based on evidence. In the case of same-sex couples adopting children, it has only been a relatively short time that same-sex couples have been able to adopt and foster and therefore, there has not been time for a proper analysis to be carried out into the effects such placements have on the children's educational, emotional and developmental wellbeing.
The decision has been called 'modern day madness' by his lawyers, the Christian Legal Centre. Andrea Williams, the chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, christians against gay adoption 'The Lord Chancellor has removed Richard from the magistracy for allegedly being 'prejudiced' and for speaking out in the media about what has happened to him.
It tries to silence opposing views and if it fails it crushes and punishes the person who holds those views. He has a lifetime of public service, expertise in mental health.
He is motivated by his Christian faith and a deep compassion for people. Thursday, Feb 14th 5-Day Forecast. Christian magistrate is sacked after claiming adopted children were better off with a man and a woman as parents than with a gay couple Christians against gay adoption Richard Page, 68, sacked after 15 years at Maidstone court Comes after comments objecting to a gay couple adopting a child Christians against gay adoption said it'd be better if it was 'man and woman who were adopted parents' By Amanda Williams for MailOnline Published: Share this article Share.
Share or comment on this article: Christian magistrate Richard Page sacked over anti-gay adoption comments e-mail wwf adult gay fanfiction Most watched News videos Daughter surprises mum after being away travelling for a year Man stumbles upon shark in formaldehyde at abandoned theme park ISIS bride pleads to reunite with her family in Canada Moment pig BITES model's bum on a Bahamas beach Disturbing moment christians against gay adoption is seen mistreating a pet dog Horrifying moment mouse is tied to a bottle and repeatedly hit Woman arrested after she unleashes fury at snowball-throwers 'Scaredy-cat' looks petrified as it watches lion documentary on TV Boyfriend throws awkward party to announce girlfriend is cheating Woman goes on a rampage at a mini-market before speeding away Man tumbles down icy driveway and nearly cracks head on wall Shocking moment christians against gay adoption drives into another vehicle making it tip.
new comment 1
new comment 2
new comment 3